Michael Moore Scorns Obama

Wow, Michael Moore is a racist too? Good god these racists are just everywhere. Why do all these people have such a hard time dealing with the fact that there's a black man in the white house?

Quote from Maverick74:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...e_to_obama_return_your_nobel_peace_prize.html

Michael Moore tweets that President Obama should return his Nobel Peace Prize after he approved military strikes on Libya.

images
 
March 22, 2011


Peace Prize Committee Members,
I trust by now you have realized the colossal mistake you made awarding Barrack Obama a Nobel Peace Prize before he had even achieved anything of significance.
As you know he now presides over no less than THREE wars. I imagine Alfred Nobel is rolling over in his grave at the thought of an incompetent war monger such as Barrack Obama being bestowed with a prize bearing his name. During your next selection process do try a little harder, won’t you?

Jay ------
Canton, GA
USA

postmaster@nobel.no

http://nobelpeaceprize.org/
 
Quote from Maverick74:

http://nation.foxnews.com/barack-ob...-more-coalition-partners-iraq-obama-has-libya

Uh oh spaghetti o's!

Fact: Bush Had 2 Times More Coalition Partners in Iraq Than Obama Has in Libya

Coalition Forces / Iraq vs. Libya

Coalition Countries - Iraq - 2003

Afghanistan,
Albania
Australia
Azerbaijan
Bulgaria
Colombia
Czech Republic
Denmark
El Salvador
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Georgia
Hungary
Italy
Japan
South Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Macedonia
Netherlands
Nicaragua
Philippines
Poland
Romania
Slovakia
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
Uzbekistan

[Source: US State Department]

Coalition - Libya - 2011

United States
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Canada
Belgium
Denmark
Norway
Qatar
Spain
Greece
Germany
Poland
Jordan
Morocco
Qatar
United Arab Emirate

Clearly, having the likes of Ethiopia, Eritrea and Nicaragua as part of the first coalition was vital for its success.

Not sure why Qatar is listed twice in the second coalition but having Qatar, Jordan, Morocco and UAE on board is not insignificant.

I don't have a dog in this fight but it seems to me comparing numbers in this way is somewhat meaningless.
 
Quote from byteme:

Clearly, having the likes of Ethiopia, Eritrea and Nicaragua as part of the first coalition was vital for its success.

Not sure why Qatar is listed twice in the second coalition but having Qatar, Jordan, Morocco and UAE on board is not insignificant.

I don't have a dog in this fight but it seems to me comparing numbers in this way is somewhat meaningless.

agree.

especially since the "coalition" in both instances was 95% US led regardless, and shouldn't have been.
 
Quote from byteme:



I don't have a dog in this fight but it seems to me comparing numbers in this way is somewhat meaningless.

You should have a dog in this fight, it's your tax dollars fighting these wars.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

You should have a dog in this fight, it's your tax dollars fighting these wars.

Not for 50% of us, so why should they care?? (Spend all you want... ain't costing ME anything"..)
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

Not for 50% of us, so why should they care?? (Spend all you want... ain't costing ME anything"..)

True, 50% of this country does not "have a dog in this fight". I guess that is the problem. Maybe we should send byteme a bill. LOL.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

True, 50% of this country does not "have a dog in this fight". I guess that is the problem. Maybe we should send byteme a bill. LOL.
Well, in a way they do. Every dollar spent on war is a dollar the government can't give away to the 50% who are freeloaders.
 
Back
Top