Michael Mann refuses to surrender data to court - contempt?

[WeToddDid2]

But you got tricked by the fake news and thought it's a matter of fact in this post

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...r-data-to-court-contempt.310965/#post-4481115

No; I didn't. The first thing I typed was the thread's title with the question mark.

 

[exGOPer]

Odd, couldn't find much from legitimate sources. The blog cited has a clear anti-global warming slant

http://principia-scientific.org

Forget the slant, the owner of that site is a known fraudster whose law 'degree' comes from a diploma bill while he is running a science blog

http://www.aaskolnick.com/global_deniers/website.htm

Right wingers have no problem attacking scientists and then run with shit like this from fake degree holders who are not even scientists.

 

[WeToddDid2]

Forget the slant, the owner of that site is a known fraudster whose law 'degree' comes from a diploma bill while he is running a science blog

http://www.aaskolnick.com/global_deniers/website.htm

Right wingers have no problem attacking scientists and then run with shit like this from fake degree holders who are not even scientists.

We will know soon enough what happens in court.

 

[exGOPer]

No; I didn't. The first thing I typed was the thread's title with the question mark.

Am not talking about the title, you are trying to have it both ways by posing it as a question and then passing the 'contempt' as something that already happened

According to the article Mann did commit contempt of court.

That's what you said, so which is it?

 

[exGOPer]

We will know soon enough what happens in court.

Exactly, so we know nothing which proves that atleast the gateway pundit site is blatantly lying when their article said this

"‘Scientist’ Michael Mann Commits Contempt of Court in ‘Climate Science Trial of the Century’"

Glad we agree that GatewayPundit is FAKE NEWS

 

[WeToddDid2]

Am not talking about the title, you are trying to have it both ways by posing it as a question and then passing the 'contempt' as something that already happened



That's what you said, so which is it?

Bullshit. I am not getting into another retarded argument with you.

QUESTION MAKE IN TITLE BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW.

I STATED "ACCORDING TO ARTICLE".

SO FUCK OFF.

 

[exGOPer]

Bullshit. I am not getting into another retarded argument with you.

I NEVER MADE ANY CLAIM!

QUESTION MAKE IN TITLE BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW.

I STATED "ACCORDING TO ARTICLE".

SO FUCK OFF.

I didn't say you made any claims.

I explained to you that you were tricked by fake news, gateway pundit made stuff up when we know NOTHING about what actually happened.

 

[gwb-trading]

Of course it has been

https://www.skepticalscience.com/broken-hockey-stick.htm

And he did hand over his data before

"said Pascal Yiou (with France’s Climate Science and Environment Laboratory), “but others have processed the same data with different methods and that didn’t change the shape of the curve”."

Then Mann should have no problem handing over his data and code to the courts.

 

[gwb-trading]

Forget the slant, the owner of that site is a known fraudster whose law 'degree' comes from a diploma bill while he is running a science blog

http://www.aaskolnick.com/global_deniers/website.htm

Right wingers have no problem attacking scientists and then run with shit like this from fake degree holders who are not even scientists.

Seeing that Skeptical Science is run by a cartoonist -- this means little.

Of course the climate alarmists endlessly attack any real climate scientist such as Dr. Judith Curry at Georgia Tech who casts any doubt on their information. All with the intent of getting her fired. Sad.

 

[CaptainObvious]

Not to worry, most of the climate cultists have long abandon the need for honest investigation of the facts. Besides, it's hot out today and that's proof enough.