Michael Mann refuses to surrender data to court - contempt?

'In other words' you made up shit hoping that a Nazi defending rag like National Review could be right. Mann's work is independently verified while the Nazi Review is not even a science rag.

Mann's work has never been independently verified. He has never handed over his data or code to anyone for verification.

When he sues people for claiming he is a fraud then at some point he will need to hand-over this information to make his case.
 
That is not the article's title. That is my thread title. I wrote that because I am not an attorney and I am not 100% certain that it is contempt.

I added title to OP.

Here is a title from another article.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...contempt-court-climate-science-trial-century/

‘Scientist’ Michael Mann Commits Contempt of Court in ‘Climate Science Trial of the Century’

As usual FAKE NEWS from the pundit

They are sourcing on another right wing source which is SPECULATING when they say 'Only possible outcome'

This is a great example of fake news, one 'source' speculates and the other run with it pretending it's already news.
 
As usual FAKE NEWS from the pundit

They are sourcing on another right wing source which is SPECULATING when they say 'Only possible outcome'

This is a great example of fake news, one 'source' speculates and the other run with it pretending it's already news.
Are you an attorney?

Have you seen the legal docs?
 
Mann's work has never been independently verified. He has never handed over his data or code to anyone for verification.

When he sues people for claiming he is a fraud then at some point he will need to hand-over this information to make his case.

Of course it has been

https://www.skepticalscience.com/broken-hockey-stick.htm

And he did hand over his data before

"said Pascal Yiou (with France’s Climate Science and Environment Laboratory), “but others have processed the same data with different methods and that didn’t change the shape of the curve”."
 
Of course it has been

https://www.skepticalscience.com/broken-hockey-stick.htm

And he did hand over his data before

"said Pascal Yiou (with France’s Climate Science and Environment Laboratory), “but others have processed the same data with different methods and that didn’t change the shape of the curve”."
Irrelevant.

Was it mandated by the court for Mann to hand over his data?

Was Mann legally obligated to hand over his data to court?

I obviously don't know the answers with 100% certainty.

But if the answer to the above questions is "yes", then is he or isn't he in contempt?
 
Irrelevant.

Was it mandated by the court for Mann to hand over his data?

Was Mann legally obligated to hand over his data to court?

I obviously don't know the answers with 100% certainty.

But if the answer to the above questions is "yes", then is he or isn't he in contempt?

I don't know, where is your source for ANY of these claims? Have you seen the legal docs or does your source link to them?

The original source who is making this claim is a known fraudulent group

http://www.aaskolnick.com/global_deniers/website.htm
 
Back
Top