I'm going to go with Michael Pitt. No relation to Brad.
Michael Pitt could be too good looking for the role and he doesn't have the dead eyes look or the sharpness to him. Ribisi could probably pull it off.
I'm going to go with Michael Pitt. No relation to Brad.
Any good actor could play the role as Livermore's face is not known to the public.
Nobody knows how he lost the $100 million he made from the 1929 crash. So that bit would have to be made up.
The film would have to show the roller coaster rides that were Livermore's life, so the film would be a more epic version of say 'Rogue Trader' which showed the rise and blow up of Nick Leeson over about five years. Livermore has a 50 year trading story.
We do know how he lost it. There were interviews of his son and step daughter. After the SEC was created in the 1930's, they outlawed most of the tactics he used to make money.
He made circa $100 million in 1929 ($1.5 billion in todays money).
He was declared bankrupt on March 7, 1934, 3 months before the SEC was even created (June 6, 1934). No one knows for sure how he lost this money.
Saying it twice doesn't make it true.
He didn't say that the SEC is the reason Livermore lost his money. What he said is that rules enforced by the SEC is why Livermore couldn't bounce back the way that he'd done before.Well i just proved the SEC wasn't the reason he lost his 1929 money. They didnt even exist when he lost it in the early 30s and declared BK. So perhaps you can tell me how he lost it then?