Last I heard, the officer who choked and killed Garner had been charged with homicide. So in that case it appears the wheels of justice are turning properly and there is no reason to get all "raced up".
Michael Brown Autopsy Reports shows he didnt have his hands up at all
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
Ok, what about the guy in the video? All that happened to him is he lost his job, the person complied 100% with what he asked, its an open and shut case, that cop should be charged with attempted murder, or aggravated assault at the least.
What about all the incidents where cops kick in the wrong door, and shoot someone who is blatantly innocent in a swat raid.
This is a serious question, why dont they ever attach themselves to cases like that which would be slam dunks for the majority of americans? Why is it always shit like this like Trayvon, or Duke Lacrosse, or Tawana Brawley. :It almost seems like they are intentionally picking bad cases, because the bad cases create division amongst blacks and whites. Blacks tend to think they are 100% innocent whites think they are 100% guilty and the truth lies in the middle. There are lots of cases where the truth is obvious but they never get any attention.
If they had a civil rights activist who went only after cases we could all identify with im pretty sure hed be a hero to both parties/races. Hell we have a thread right here on ET full of police abuse on both blacks and whites, and it rattles conservatives just as much as liberals.
Forensic expert urges caution on Michael Brown autopsy analysis
Details from an official autopsy on slain teen Michael Brown that were leaked to reporters could bolster his killer’s claim of self-defense. But just hours after the details were published, one of the experts whose analysis was central to those claims told msnbc that her analysis of the findings had been taken out of context.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/forensic-expert-says-michael-brown-autopsy
Details from an official autopsy on slain teen Michael Brown that were leaked to reporters could bolster his killer’s claim of self-defense. But just hours after the details were published, one of the experts whose analysis was central to those claims told msnbc that her analysis of the findings had been taken out of context.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/forensic-expert-says-michael-brown-autopsy
Melinek said that she had compared the forensic evidence included in the official autopsy report and Wilson’s statements and found them consistent. Since the report indicated the wound to Brown’s right thumb was close and in line to the barrel of Wilson’s gun when it discharged, it could mean he had been reaching for the gun.
“I’m not saying that Brown going for the gun is the only explanation. I’m saying the officer said he was going for the gun and the right thumb wound supports that,” she said. “I have limited information. It could also be consistent with other scenarios. That’s the important thing. That’s why the witnesses need to speak to the grand jury and the grand jury needs to hear all the unbiased testimony and compare those statements to the physical evidence.”
Hahahaha she probably already witnessed the fury of the intolerant left, no doubt she has had all kinds of death threats for proving the story, so she has to change her statement, now shes only saying that the autopsy backs Wilsons statements 100%, BUT other things like alien invasions COULD have happened..... what a fucking joke the left has become.
Lawrence Odonnels story, "Well we cant disprove that more bullets were fired, and they missed and we cant find them. This autopsy doesnt show all the bullets that missed that we dont know about. Lawrence "Odonnell gets absolutely destroyed in this video, and you are stupid enough to post this as if its evidence for your side.
Well We also cant disprove that an alien attacked michael brown. These guys are a joke, all of this so called evidence would get destroyed in court. You animals have now been reduced to getting owned by the bipartisan forensics expert, all because you want to believe so badly that criminals like michael brown are innocent.
Last edited:
Are you a forensic expert ?
Nope, but the woman in the segment you quoted is, and she believes Wilsons version, im not sure how MSNBC could have muffed that story so badly unless they were intentional;ly trying to mislead people.
Listen to the video you posted, the headline doesnt match what she was saying at all.
I thank spike trader for pointing this video out, and i STRONGLY ENCOURAGE anyone with interest in this case to watch this video. Watch how badly an MSNBC host tries to brow beat a forensic scientist into accepting his claims, and she will not go along with it. MSNBC should be disgusted with this kind of stuff, they are literally trying to take an innocent mans life away from him, while every expert in the book disagrees with their radical opinion of how things went down.
Watch the video spike posted to see just how badly laurence odonnell gets owned. Plus the guy was acting like a defense lawyer not a journalist, and his only goal was to muddy the waters as much as he could in this interview trying to cast the dispersion of reasonable doubt.
All you need to see in order to draw the conclusion that radical leftists like lawrence odonnell are on the wrong side of this one, is the FACT that they are trying to convict Wilson using reasonable doubt, which doesnt fly in our system.
The ONLY responses odonell has to the scientific evidence is flaky thoughts like "Couldnt anything have happened there."
Its the kind of questioning you would expect from a 2 year old pretending to be one of the ghostbusters. America should be proud of the fact we dont let assholes like lawrence odonell convict people simply by creating fantasies that COULD HAVE HAPPENED.
:Its funny that the left still isnt backing down on this when all they are left with is fantasy scenarios to support their position.
Watch the video spike posted to see just how badly laurence odonnell gets owned. Plus the guy was acting like a defense lawyer not a journalist, and his only goal was to muddy the waters as much as he could in this interview trying to cast the dispersion of reasonable doubt.
All you need to see in order to draw the conclusion that radical leftists like lawrence odonnell are on the wrong side of this one, is the FACT that they are trying to convict Wilson using reasonable doubt, which doesnt fly in our system.
The ONLY responses odonell has to the scientific evidence is flaky thoughts like "Couldnt anything have happened there."
Its the kind of questioning you would expect from a 2 year old pretending to be one of the ghostbusters. America should be proud of the fact we dont let assholes like lawrence odonell convict people simply by creating fantasies that COULD HAVE HAPPENED.
:Its funny that the left still isnt backing down on this when all they are left with is fantasy scenarios to support their position.
Last edited:
Try not to confuse them with facts. Makes them sad.
You and Sharpton have lunch or something?
