Quote from jem:
I agree... but to make it easy how about... a rule which says any executive caught betting company funds in the market goes to prison for 5 to 10 years minimum.
Any auditor or accountant who does not immediately report unusually activity to to the cftc or sec loses goes to jail and their firm must repay the loses suffered by parties exposed to the loses.
That corzine is not in prison... threatens the safety of all banks and all futures accounts.
Anybody allowing anyone who works for a futures merchant or stock trading outfit... has a duty to make sure the funds being bet are not customer funds...
Otherwise they will also make up the loses out of whatever profits they have and the execs and the brokers executing the trades will go to jail too.
Quote from Fractals 'R Us:
That smacks of "regulation".. Republicans have not been for regulation in decades and Democrats like Corzine are capitalizing on the situation. Getting the bill through is unlikely.
Quote from comintel:
I am getting several offers for my PFG claim in the mail.
They are currently offering another 25% or so beyond the initial 30%.
These companies will be our best friends after they accumulate a large number of claims, because they will sue the banks and others involved on a class action basis and they will do so aggressively.
They would not be offering a total of 55% (less the 30% already distributed) if they thought that ultimately only 60% would be recovered.
So do not sell your claim.
If things go well when they pursue the class actions, we may eventually see a much higher recovery if the banks and auditors etc. settle. And everyone will get the benefit of the final recovery settlement if they hold out and do not sell their claim! [/QUOTE
Selling your claim leads to capital loss treatment. It's better to use Rev. Proc. 2009-20 for full ordinary loss treatment.
Quote from dangerkitty:
Just because I trade futures does not mean that I am accepting a non segregated, at risk situation for my account.
Quote from jem:
If you wish to get political...
Oddly, I saw it as clear swift criminal sanctions for regulations already on the books.
Which is more a conservative idea. The dems and the left don't really seem capable of doing anything wall street does not want them to do since they the bankers make up most of the dems cabinets.