Quote from HurricaneUS:
That's where you and I differ....among other things....Everyone can NOT be taught proper trade management. 90% of traders can not trade in a fashion in which you lose more than you win. Is it a coincidence that 90% of traders are net losers. Is it a coincidence that 90% of traders are seeking "high-probability, high win rate" trading gimmicks. To the contrary the scam artists promise high win rate systems and not low win rate methods....like Michael Harris perhaps?
A breakdown of your ramblings:
- Everyone can NOT be taught proper trade management
- 90% of traders cannot trade in a fashion in which you lose more than you win
-"high-probability, high win rate" trading gimmicks.
- To the contrary the scam artists promise high win rate systems and not low win rate methods....
If you do not know that a low win rate method requires catching extended trends you have no right to pretend you know anything. At a 20% win rate you need an avg. win to avg. loss ratio of 4 just to break even, commission and slippage excluded. Possibly need around 5 to break even with commission and slippage. If you have ever traded you should know that is something very hard if not impossible in short term and intraday trading.
According to your ramblings, in order to maintain a reasonable profit factor of 2 one must have an avg. win to avg. loss ratio of 8. If commissions, slippage, etc. is included it can go up to 10.
You are the scam artist. You are promising R = 10 to people just by teaching them money management. Nobody gets even R = 2 without an edge. They will never get R = 4 without a sophisticated edge. R = 6 is impossible without an edge to time trends and reduce losses due to whipsaws.
I think you are trying to fool people.
You are the scam artist.