Err lol its evening here and been a long day and I'm tired so just forget what I wrote about orders taking time to reach the exchange as my stop loss is sent out as a bracket order so should be there during the trade already...



It's even worst then, cause bracket orders are held on the broker server until they gets triggered and forward to the exchange. You have no control on the time it takes once they gets triggered.Err lol its evening here and been a long day and I'm tired so just forget what I wrote about orders taking time to reach the exchange as my stop loss is sent out as a bracket order so should be there during the trade already...
![]()
Well back again with slippage in the MES...
I'm based in Europe and my regular trading vehicle is the ESTOXX 50 where during regular trading hours I trade a 10 contract size, and never have any slippage whatsoever.
I'm just trying to find a second correlated market to trade, the ES/MES theoretically filling that bill so far, and putting on test trades to see what I might expect execution wise.
I'm entering on stop limits, so no issues there.
I was stopped out twice long after todays CPI etc numbers had come out, and also after the initial RTH opening surge and volatility had calmed down.
I still had slippage on my two losing trades of 3 ticks one time, 2 ticks the second time.
Now not anything earth shattering obviously...
BUT
This is on a 1 contract MES trade size during RTH and not during any news/numbers induced extra volatility ???
Whats the slippage like when you're trading size ???
Whats so weird is that on the ESTOXX I never have that, on the MES practically all the time with the smallest possible position size.
Are there some execution shenanigans going on or sthg ?
This is not really sthg you should have with miniscule trade size on one of the most liquid markets in the world during RTH and non news times.
Thanks
Quite baffled to be honest...
I just remember reading old threads here where people were talking of 100 plus ES orders with no more than 1 tick slippage.
So really seems to me that something is fundamentally off with my one lot getting nearly three whole points slippage.
symbol, max_clip, mean_spread, mean_touch
MES.n.0, 199, 1.11, 26.06
MES.n.1, 53, 2.10, 5.62
MNQ.n.0, 84, 1.69, 2.99
MNQ.n.1, 120, 6.88, 1.80
ES.n.0, 452, 1.04, 34.19
ES.n.1, 250, 1.21, 11.94
NQ.n.0, 156, 2.02, 2.68
NQ.n.1, 96, 4.81, 2.59
I ran some quick stats for you on a random date close to a rollover:
Code:symbol, max_clip, mean_spread, mean_touch MES.n.0, 199, 1.11, 26.06 MES.n.1, 53, 2.10, 5.62 MNQ.n.0, 84, 1.69, 2.99 MNQ.n.1, 120, 6.88, 1.80 ES.n.0, 452, 1.04, 34.19 ES.n.1, 250, 1.21, 11.94 NQ.n.0, 156, 2.02, 2.68 NQ.n.1, 96, 4.81, 2.59
n.0 is Databento notation for lead month by open interest, n.1 is 2nd lead month, and so on.
You can see that the mean spread and liquidity at touch on MES lead month is about 1.1 ticks and 26 contracts, so for most trades you do actually expect only 1 tick of slippage.
However, we typically see 90th percentile spreads at about 2x, so if you just randomly executed 1 lot any time of the day in a uniform distribution, you'll already see 10 out of 100 trades have a slippage over 2.2 ticks!
Add on to that what others have said - if you're executing outside the US cash equity session, you can expect a larger slippage. 11 ticks is not unusual. Keep in mind that this is just a consequence of less liquidity at touch alone. There are periods of elevated volatility during the non-US session (e.g. ECB release) where the slippage will be even higher.
On the other hand, you can see ES has mean spread of 1.2 ticks and 34 lots on this day, so what you've said about executing 100 lot clips with about 1.x ticks of slippage also seems about right.
