Quote from Pabst:
Hey Dark. Please expand on what you mean by "personal sacrafice." Do you mean additional work habits or the power to overcome self destructive mania?
His whole comment is important to understand. And, of course, you question may lead to an amplification of why and how he got to the place he is.
When it is understood, you then can have a fairly clear view of how far darkhorse has gotten up to this point in his life and, further, what he still has to overcome to go to better places.
The entire thread points out that there is a spectrum of considerations for trading. What if it were a gausian-like curve for measuring success.
What kind of band-pass filter would commercial providers use to select, process, and maintain performance of their clients?
What if the problem was, as surfer intimates: the poor functioning of commercial providers.
Potential clients (losers) go through drastic and dynamic change as well. It occurs before, during and after they quit. The "before" handicaps are often so instilled, that they are not repairable. Acquired handicaps are probably even worse since they are a pairing of method and emotions. If each were just good or bad, only one of the four possibilities would lead to success anyway. Three kinds of losers and one kind of winner.
People suggest that failures should take breaks and try again. What could cause repairs to take place by quitting and returning later. For the three types of failure, it seems that this broad suggestion would have little chance of affecting repair.
Some experts in repair and not in the finance industry, suggest pro active repair making. Again, the suggestions are not often direct ones but more like "health" oriented ones. This may be a consideration that could be well considered by losers.
How do people reach thresholds for success? If not reached, is failure an absolute, or is it possible that as "learning" occurs, a trader is born also.