Quote from AngryBull:
Candletrader says that it`s more or less impossible to
reach an average of more than 1-2 points per day
trading the Es-minis.
I don´t agree.
But I agree most traders fail to be profitable.
Why?
99% of the population have no abilities to be good traders
in the first selection because they lack the abilty to make
qiuck economic decisions with you own money in seconds.
Secondly you have to be patience to wait out the the right
trigger.
Thirdly you have to have good moneymanagent and don´t
blame yourself for a trade going wrong instead you have to
be able to take the loss quickly and reverse your position.
You also have to do a lot of work devolping a good trading-
system.
I think maximum one Man/ woman per 100.000 has these
abilities.
Maximum!
Candle, yourself, others have gone through a reasoned process to develop "a good trading system". Votes are tallied to indicate what is what. For me, I did not vote. The spectrum chosen did not apply to SCT trading. It applied to "good trading systems" only apparently.
These systems allow traders to gain occassional opportunities dailywhen the edge arrives if it does and doesn't fail to process to a conclusion. Traders net results as a consequence of tasks peformed. Your system has requirements that you express above: quickness to react; management of money; taking losses quickly, and now, reversing to get to a better place.
I do not see how anyone could do this poorly and you are verysuspicious that 1 person in 100,000 can.
There is a royal screw up going on here. a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, point variation a day is absolutely guaranteed. Picking off a point a day is impossible not to just fall into. There is continual stuff here about people losing many points or less a day. Notice that someone is opposite hem.
Your post makes me think that you and folks like you do not know anyone making any money out there.
You suggest people, in general or 99%, do not have ability to make money. Every one who has posted in ET can pull down all the money they need. They just haven't started to walk across the bridge to success. It sure as shit does not in any way come down to originating "good trading systems" and trading them.
There is zero demand and zero requirement to do anything new different or unique to make money steadily day after day after day.
Learning how to stay on the sidelines when it is appropriate is the best training a person can get.
The single question everyone has to always have the answer to is: Do I know what the market is doing? Here in ET day by day that question is not answered over and over.
When does a person ever get the right to go in the market? It definitely is not when that person makes a personal judgement that he has completed the design and can operate a "good trading system". "good trading systems" do not ever come close to making 1 or 2 points a day on average and have a money management sysems that keeps money out of the market. Making 1 or 2 points a day in ES and having a maximum of capital in the market on that trade that is 3% of capital is just a vaccuum of thinking and performance.
"Good trading systems" exploit all market opportunitiesavailable and have the perponderance of total capital at diversified risk at all times. Whatever other alternatives that are considered "good trading systems" most also be "working" in a way that resources are applied to opportunity.
Some one here pointed out the Nobel crews worked 30 years on their stuff to get to where they got. The first minute any person gets the twinkling in their eye to make money in markets, they actually avail themselves to a construct and in place foundation that is so large it is indescribable. It is impossible to create from scratch in the global electronic network of resourses.
how long does it take to get out of a person's system that making money in a market is related to chosin a singular market phenomena as the basis. We expect bagger, etc to "pick 5". they do that for the lottery every day. We do not expect experienced people to be stuck in singularity or absoluteness only or relatavistic only. Posting that 99,999 in 100,000 miss the boat is bordering on silly.