If there is any evidence you can point to, then I will give it due consideration.
Memo looks like a nothing burger... Read it here
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
I'm asking for your opinion on the subject. It's a simple question, Freddie. Do you believe these "unfortunate events" wherein the Democratic party essentially rigged the primary to minimize Bernie's chances were done without the Clinton campaign being aware of it at all?
No doubt the Federal KGB used that picture to get warrants on quite a few people.
And look at the way that popadopolous is holding his hands. He is clearly giving some kind of signals to Trump as he sits there. See what I am sayin? Guaranteed that that will be reported to the FISA Court when it comes time to renew the warrants. Yup. That surveillance is not going to end any time soon with that type of thing going on.
Honestly? I don't know.
I'm still trying to get over your opinion that Trump and his team's hands are clean.
See, this is why it's so difficult attempting to have civil discourse with you. You dodge the issues until the last. We know the primary was rigged to oust Bernie. We know questions were given to Hillary in advance of debates (the fact that questions were leaked to Hillary automatically makes her corrupt in this case since she had to know the questions were leaked).
Well, regardless of whether or not you can see any connection, the vast majority of Americans (inclusive of many, many Bernie supporters) certainly believed Clinton was part of the "fix". So whether or not she actually knew anything about it (as you say, there is no proof tying her, specifically, to it) voters believed she did. And honestly, that's all that mattered. They voted accordingly.
As for Trump, I simply said there was no Russian collusion. I'm happy to admit I've erred, when (if) some evidence showing otherwise makes it somewhere. But the best you guys have is some facebook ads.
I'm sure Trump is corrupt - as I've said, you don't get to the highest office in the land without being corrupt in some fashion. Not in this country.
Well, let's see.
In the last election cycle, the republican primary candidates included a black guy, two Hispanic guys, a white guy who speaks fluent Spanish and is married to a real live Mexican immigrant, and a woman.
What kind of a line-up did the dems have? Nevermind.
Please stop presenting facts here, they have no place in this emotional discussion and are only distracting.
Lighten up, Francis.
My understanding is that there was only one question that was actually shared, about the death penalty. Perhaps I am mistaken. And it was less than ideal that Hillary went along with it. But to now label her as "corrupt" is a bit over the top. You want corrupt? I think you'll see corrupt. (The Donald doth protest too much.)
In the meantime:
Inclusion isn’t being at the table, it’s belonging at the table. And who ran the table? The guy who took the most racist stand.
I guess everything is open to debate though. Your version of textbook racism maybe different than Paul Ryan’s.
You're still not getting it, but I guess I'm not surprised. Hyper partisanship and all that. It doesn't matter if it was only one itty bitty question of minor import - all the cool kids do it!
What matters it the perception that she was crooked. That's it.
If Trump had been leaked a question, you'd have been all over it. We'd still be hearing about it.