Memo looks like a nothing burger... Read it here

[TreeFrogTrader]

It was reported the fbi presented the dossier to the court as a political document or something to that effect. For the fbi to present it as a bipartisan document would have given the impression of partiality. It is what it is, a political document.

Uh oh. Houston we have a problem.

 

[elderado]

Numbers one and two are incomplete because they conveniently omit the dossier was also funded by a right wing organization as well. It is a bipartisan effort.

Uh, no. Nice try, though, and thanks for playing.

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a story Feb. 2 about a Republican memo on the Russia investigation, The Associated Press erroneously reported that a former British spy’s work on an opposition research project was initially funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. Though the former spy, Christopher Steele, was hired by a firm that was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon, he did not begin work on the project until after Democratic groups had begun funding it.

 

[UsualName]

You could learn to be more realistic and accept the fact that the deep state tried to frame Trump on Russian collusion but it was the DNC and the FBI who actually did it. I would find it impossible for Obama not to have been involved. It would seem he was certain 'an insurance policy' was in the works....

O, the deep state. I forgot.

 

[UsualName]

Uh, no. Nice try, though, and thanks for playing.

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a story Feb. 2 about a Republican memo on the Russia investigation, The Associated Press erroneously reported that a former British spy’s work on an opposition research project was initially funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. Though the former spy, Christopher Steele, was hired by a firm that was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon, he did not begin work on the project until after Democratic groups had begun funding it.

Why do you think it makes a difference when Steele came in on the project?

 

[elderado]

Why do you think it makes a difference when Steele came in on the project?

Apparently reading comprehension is not your forte? Sorry, I assumed you actually understood your own writing.

My bad.

 

[UsualName]

Uh oh. Houston we have a problem.

You have a problem:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...sa-10pm:homepage/story&utm_term=.7d136fa3b26c

 

[UsualName]

Apparently reading comprehension is not your forte? Sorry, I assumed you actually understood your own writing.

My bad.

Yeah, I stand behind the dossier had funding from a right wing source. That is true.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

You have a problem:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/justice-dept-told-court-of-sources-political-bias-in-request-to-wiretap-ex-trump-campaign-aide-officials-say/2018/02/02/caecfa86-0852-11e8-8777-2a059f168dd2_story.html?amp;utm_term=.0f9bb5d13648&hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_fisa-10pm:homepage/story&utm_term=.7d136fa3b26c

link won't open because I am not a subscriber. can't read it, I don't subscribe to any dnc publications. I think they want something like a dollar a year to subscribe online and I don't want to be ripped off like that.

paste the article.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Why do you think it makes a difference when Steele came in on the project?

Apparently reading comprehension is not your forte'

 

[UsualName]

link won't open because I am not a subscriber. can't read it, I don't subscribe to any dnc publications. I think they want something like a dollar a year to subscribe online and I don't want to be ripped off like that.

paste the article.

It opens for me and I don’t subscribe.