Memo looks like a nothing burger... Read it here

Numbers one and two are incomplete because they conveniently omit the dossier was also funded by a right wing organization as well. It is a bipartisan effort. ;)

Remains to be seen if the bulk of the Dossier was collected while Republican funded, or when Democrats took over. Not that it matters
 
Numbers one and two are incomplete because they conveniently omit the dossier was also funded by a right wing organization as well. It is a bipartisan effort. ;)
Way before it got to the court. That does not in anyway excuse using it to frame a presidential candidate of the crime of treason. Either way this is a sad time for the upper echelons of the FBI and DJ.
 
Right. We have republicans getting their brains washed by Fox News into thinking Carter Page wasn’t a known quantity being watched by the fbi for suspicious dealings with the Russian as far back as 2013..


Viewers should note that Usual Tard is using the official dem talking point script that he has been given.

The official lefty argument is that the fact that the fbi was watching Page before the dossier was developed and used to get the FISA warrant "proves" that the dossier is not what launched the FBI warrant.

No, it is the other way around, it proves that the FBI had been watching Page for three years but could not find enough on him to get a warrant, maybe even had one rejected by the FISA court, so then they used the dossier as a kicker to get a warrant.

Remember, McCabe told the Committee that "there would not have been a fisa warrant without the dossier."
 
Last edited:
Way before it got to the court. That does not in anyway excuse using it to frame a presidential candidate of the crime of treason. Either way this is a sad time for the upper echelons of the FBI and DJ.

Define “way before.” There isn’t that much time between.
 
Viewers should note that Usual Tard is using the official dem talking point script that he has been given.

The official lefty argument is that the fact that the fbi was watching Page before the dossier was developed and used to get the FISA warrant "proves" that the dossier is not what launched the FBI warrant.

No, it is the other way around, it proves that the FBI had been watching Page for three years but could not find enough on him to get a warrant, maybe even had one rejected by the FISA court, so then they used the dossier as a kicker to get a warrant.

Remember, McCabe told the Committee that "there would not have been a fisa warrant without the dossier."

Total nonsense. Intelligence agencies surveil targets for years, gathering information on contacts and networks, plots and schemes.

Nice try, though.
 
Total nonsense. Intelligence agencies surveil targets for years, gathering information on contacts and networks, plots and schemes.

Nice try, though.

Ask him a counter question, Republicans have been investigating Clinton for 30 years and couldn't even bring a single charge so does that prove Clintons are innocent.

Also Mcabe never said what he quoted, it's a paraphrase from the memo which Nunes never read. Cons just lie and lie and lie and then call others liars so as to not have any standards at all. If everything is fake news then no news can be trusted, Goebbels would be proud.
 
I'm guessing Shepherd Smith is protected by Rupert Murdock's son who wants to keep a fig leaf of actual journalism? They must realise they must have something palatable for normal intelligence conservatives.


The way he repeats Trump's near gibberish statement is pleasing.

What a surprise, the video has been pulled. The Hannity ones always seem to stay up..
 
Back
Top