It's not about religion - it's about CONSERVATISM vs LIBERALISM. There is no difference between radical Christianity and radical Islam - radical Christianity has been tempered by centuries of liberal enlightenment otherwise you conservatives would be fucking your own daughters in your trailer park while persecuting gays and minorities like you used to.
Melania Trump’s Immigration Lawyer Slams Child Separation on Fox: Its Like Nazi Germany, Slave Trade
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
It's not about religion - it's about CONSERVATISM vs LIBERALISM. There is no difference between radical Christianity and radical Islam - radical Christianity has been tempered by centuries of liberal enlightenment otherwise you conservatives would be fucking your own daughters in your trailer park while persecuting gays and minorities like you used to.
And by the way
Trump's wife worked illegally during her first weeks in the US
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ing-her-first-weeks-in-us-documents-show.html
Let's put her in a cage?
Promoting Islam is not about religion? Islam is a religion, Christianity is a religion. Do you think Islam is sports club you stupid twat.
So when US took in hundred of Jewish refugees after WWII, US was promoting Judaism? Or they were simply taking in people who have experienced atrocities in their home country?
Are you an inbred? Because it does seem that your logical faculties have been numbed down by years of gene mixing.
There is a thing called personal accountability. Personal accountability involves making appropiate decisions to keep your family comfortable and safe. In the United States, children are removed from their parents in the name of safety. Typical standards for child removal include if food is in the refrigerator or if shelter is provided. The overwhelming majority of these cases involve substance abuse or a serious crime on the part of the parent(s).
Why should potential immigrants be afforded more rights than its own citizens?
As far as cages are concerned, they are practical, low cost solution to a major new flood of potential immigrants to the United States, perhaps as instigated by the Radical Left for political purposes. The likely Radical Left motive would be to use these immigrants as a source of votes, not for humanitarian reasons.
Take a look at long term Democratically controlled slums in our major cities to see how much they really care for their citizens or how well their policies actually work in the real world.
Characterizing the separation of parents and children as Nazism is inappropriate because we don't send them into force labor camps or worse. Many of these children's parents made the choice to attempt to cross the border of a foreign country through illegitimate means. Although many of these families may have been encouraged by the Radical Left to make the border crossing attempt, the consequences, at least for now, rest completely the with parents.
By the way, how are some of these South American families making it through Mexican customs? A little help from the Radical Leftists, perhaps?
Children and the word Nazi have long been used to evoke emotional sympathy to a cause. Indeed, photos of Hitler with a child sitting on his lap has been used in Nazi propaganda.
This is especially true when there are few rational arguments in support of an unpopular open border policy among the citizens of a country.
This is the problem, you refuse to face facts.
Trump and his administration are on the RECORD saying that they are implementing the current policy to act as a deterrent - they don't give a shit about child's safety, they consider it as an 'infestation' (Trump's own words) and they want to eradicate it like Nazis did to Jews. Do you want sources for my claims?
Nobody is arguing that all these people should be granted citizenship or asylum, but there is a better way to treat people other than treating them like infestation because you yourself without any volition happen to be in a place where others are not. Did Obama take all the people in looking for asylum? No. Did he treat asylum seekers the same way the Biblical Messiah Christian Family Pedo is doing?
W'HAT ABOUT! WHAT ABOUT!' I am not talking about the US Government and Jews you sausage licker. I am talking about your claim of being an atheist while promoting Islam.
She must have been given amnesty. However, I am willing to revoke her amnesty and all others who have been previously granted amnesty if they have performed serious illegal acts.
The children of foreign countries do not have a say to the type of shelter that is afforded to them, especially when there is an unanticipated and overwhelming number of them. In the U.S., after a natural disaster, many of its own citizens are forced into tents, gymnasiums, and stadiums.
So the first illegal act is not good enough to act against her but mothers and children should be separated as a deterrent because they don't have asses good enough for Trump to fuck? Melania was worth of the Einstein visa but some Honduran woman trying to escape violence must not be given a hearing while treating her child like vermin
Melania Trump obtained US citizenship on a visa reserved for immigrants with "extraordinary ability" and "sustained national and international acclaim", according to a report in the Washington Post.
Nicknamed the "Einstein Visa", the EB-1 is in theory reserved for people who are highly acclaimed in their field - the government cites Pulitzer, Oscar, and Olympic winners as examples - as well as respected academic researchers and multinational executives.
Can you tell me about Melania's extraordinary ability?
Who cares what you are talking about, I am not here to answer your fucking questions.
I asked a simple question - is taking in refugees promoting a religion? When US took in Jews, was the US government promoting Judaism? If not, then your point is fucking ridiculous.