I can imagine an exceptional clown, I can't imagine an exceptional model whose only talent is to wear someone else's clothes and walk like automata on a ramp. Now if that model was truly classy and represented many brands like say Kate Moss, I can understand. But what the heck has Melania ever done to be in the same category as Kate Moss or Claudia Schiffer?
Melania Trump’s Immigration Lawyer Slams Child Separation on Fox: Its Like Nazi Germany, Slave Trade
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
I can imagine an exceptional clown, I can't imagine an exceptional model whose only talent is to wear someone else's clothes and walk like automata on a ramp. Now if that model was truly classy and represented many brands like say Kate Moss, I can understand. But what the heck has Melania ever done to be in the same category as Kate Moss or Claudia Schiffer?
But she won't be and you won't even see her papers which Dotard promised to release but never did - like his taxes. Laws don't apply to people in positions of wealth and power, they are only meant for the poor and the defenseless.
The 'founding' principle itself didn't apply to black people at the time, you do know that right?
Learn to trade and you will have nothing to do other than putting idiots in their right place.
You are wrong for telling me that. Good night and good bye.
Ah don't you love the genuine conservative brain con, they can't handle disgust. So fragile and yet noisy.
Back to the ad hominem already? Although I have already dealt your arguments a crushing blow, I'm feeling warmed up. Perhaps I'll post "tools the Radical Left uses to control their naive base in your "Trump the world's most notorious liar" thread. I know about these tools because I have been misled by them.
You frequently mischaracterize things, use statistics inappropriately, focus on emotional tools, use ad hominem attacks, attempt to redirect arguments, and attempt to prove a whole group is bad by the actions of one.
Do you really want me to overwhelmingly prove this point by going through and quoting your posts?
The bottom line is most of your arguments do not support the "issue" you are pushing.
Now you run away, again, as shown by your statement "I don't give a fuck about your simple questions, fuck your questions. Does it look like this is an interview?". This is supposed to be a debate. There are questions in a debate, like your statement quoted above. I answer your questions, but you usually run away from most of my questions.
Would be be fair to say you are a weak minded, foreign Radical Leftist who attempts to use spurious arguments in order to push an harmful agenda on a culture for the purpose of gaining political power on behalf of your organization?
You know who I am? Another unsupported statement. If you support this statement, I will release you and this site from legal liablility, authorize you to disclose this information here, in this thread, and offer you a posting concession as an incentive for you to provide this information. Now, for once, reach deep into your brain, if need be, and support your goddamn statement.
Slartibartfast, you should apologize to me for giving exGOPer a like for his post in this thread. I know your reasoning power is greater than what you've shown by that action.
I thought he was replying to the lactose intolerant chap
You are kinda stupid and irritating very often though to be fair. If you want fewer ad-homs.. consider being less painful. It is good you can appreciate humor but.. something is very amiss.
However I am kind of smiling at the idea of your childhood in a drug dealing family. Don't get me wrong, just you are such a lightweight boy scout it must have been something like Steve Martin in the Jerk growing up with a black family. You should write down some of this and we can see if we can make some good sketches. I know some TV people.
Remember, Jordan says that men who don't 'integrate' their dark sides can't be virtuous.
You are replying to a post that wasn't even meant for you, is this what you call dealing arguments a crushing blow? The post you are replying to is for a troll who tried to pass off a dumb analogy as a question and I destroyed it by asking him about Jewish refugees. He said by taking Muslim refugees in, Merkel is promoting Islam - so I asked him whether taking in Jewish refugees during WW2 meant that US promoted Judaism. What is logically inconsistent with what I said? What are you so upset about?
My bad. The alerts link landed me on your post to another person. I apologize for not checking closer.