Megyn Kelly tells Newt Gingrich to go work on his anger issues

[gwb-trading]

Yes but so what? Fox does the same to its clientel.

Yes, they do. The point is that CNN is merely playing to its audience. The implication that the video "makes Newt and Trump looks bad" only holds true with CNN's audience. The exact same video on FOX "makes Newt and Trump look good" to their audience.

 

[Zzzz1]

You want to see issues where there are none. Your Obama example is a perfectly fine, legitimate, and above all, grammatically correct sentence , other than of course that it makes zero sense. (just because someone is born in country X does not mean he cannot become a future citizen of country Y) . You probably meant that then he cannot be American President.

you are arguing grammar, we are arguing journalism.

putting "if" before a very prejudicial loaded question or a presupposition on national t.v. does not make it acceptable.

if Obama was born in Kenya then he would not be an American.
lefty journalists do not let that "if" extinguish the loaded part of that question.

 

[Zzzz1]

Because the audience on Fox is on average dumber. Had the same verbiage happened just with political characters exchanged to Democrats then the CNN audience would have equally denounced the speaker's attacks on the journalist. Calling a journalist interested in everything sex without any factual foundation simply disqualifies such person. Democrat or Republican does not matter in this context.

Yes, they do. The point is that CNN is merely playing to its audience. The implication that the video "makes Newt and Trump looks bad" only holds true with CNN's audience. The exact same video on FOX "makes Newt and Trump look good" to their audience.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Because the audience on Fox is on average dumber.

Libs have no legitimate arguments, so they go to personal downing.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

You want to see issues where there are none. Your Obama example is a perfectly fine, legitimate, and above all, grammatically correct sentence , other than of course that it makes zero sense. (just because someone is born in country X does not mean he cannot become a future citizen of country Y) . You probably meant that then he cannot be American President.

INCOHERENT

 

[Nine_Ender]

Libs have no legitimate arguments, so they go to personal downing.

To be quite blunt, anyone such as yourself that addresses any topic in terms of what "liberals" do appears to be ignorant and unable to grasp real complexities in life. There is no such thing as people being "liberals" or not being "liberals". Doubt you can comprehend what I am saying, you are so caught up in this religion that clouds your judgement.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

To be quite blunt, anyone such as yourself that addresses any topic in terms of what "liberals" do appears to be ignorant and unable to grasp real complexities in life. There is no such thing as people being "liberals" or not being "liberals". Doubt you can comprehend what I am saying, you are so caught up in this religion that clouds your judgement.

and the point is confirmed as the lib descends immediately to personal attack

 

[Buy1Sell2]

There are only two types of people with regard to political thought. ------Liberals and Conservatives. There is no such thing as a "Moderate" --A Moderate is a Liberal who either won't admit it or doesn't understand that their beliefs are liberal.

 

[Nine_Ender]

and the point is confirmed as the lib descends immediately to personal attack

Nothing in my post indicates a "liberal" or "conservative" agenda. What I am in fact highlighting is the bigotry in your post; apparently your religious handbook tells you I must be a "liberal" because I opposed your simplistic ideas.

 

[Nine_Ender]

There are only two types of people with regard to political thought. ------Liberals and Conservatives. There is no such thing as a "Moderate" --A Moderate is a Liberal who either won't admit it or doesn't understand that their beliefs are liberal.

So following your stated logic, an avid Nazi supporter under Hitler must either be "Liberal" or "Conservative". Having to categorize in that way, they'd have to be "Conservative". If you are uncomfortable with that idea, then you must question your entire premise about the world.