Damn, that was fine viewing. I bet he walked funny after the interview.
Megyn Kelly tells Newt Gingrich to go work on his anger issues
- Thread starter Tony Stark
- Start date
So, anyone whom you dont like is leftist? Last time I checked Kelly worked at FOX, a highly conservative news channel who has covered Trump more than any other candidate.
So, its not really about people who are left or right leaning, its basically just whether someone agrees or disagrees with your convictions?
So, its not really about people who are left or right leaning, its basically just whether someone agrees or disagrees with your convictions?
but she does look extremely hot. Would love to grab her by the genitals and kiss her against her will 
That a political hack like Gingrich is still around is a clear statement of how deseased our political system is.
E.G:
Ethics violations, charges and fines
In 1989, a U.S. tax court took the unusual step of denying a request for tax-exempt status for a group Gingrich formed, the American Campaign Academy, whose mission was to train political operatives. The IRS ruled that the academy was partisan because it served "the private interests of Republican party entities rather than public interests exclusively."
In January, 1997 Gingrich faced ethics charges related to his use of charitable organizations to subsidize his partisan political activities. It was revealed that Gingrich and his top consultants had repeatedly attempted to use tax-deductible charitable donations to help promote political goals. The same month, the House of Representatives voted 395 to 28 to reprimand Gingrich, then Speaker of the House, and ordered him to pay an unprecedented $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing. Gingrich was charged with using a college course that he taught, called "Renewing American Civilization," to further his political agenda. When the House Ethics Committee questioned him about it, Gingrich made false ("glaringly inconsistent") statements regarding the charges. Five Democrats said they voted "present" -- neither for nor against the reprimand -- because they believed the sanction was not severe enough. It was the first time in the House's history that it had ever disciplined a speaker for ethical wrongdoing. [7] [8]
In December, 1998 Gingrich completed payment of a $300,000 penalty imposed for violations of House rules. Gingrich initially planned to pay the fine with a $300,000 loan from former Senate majority leader Robert J. Dole (R-Kan.). After Democrats and some commentators argued the loan was a "sweetheart deal" and amounted to a gift, Gingrich said he paid "through wholly personal funds." Gingrich admitted he misled the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct and should have sought better legal advice before using tax-exempt organizations to advance his political goals. [9] [10]
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Newt_Gingrich
E.G:
Ethics violations, charges and fines
In 1989, a U.S. tax court took the unusual step of denying a request for tax-exempt status for a group Gingrich formed, the American Campaign Academy, whose mission was to train political operatives. The IRS ruled that the academy was partisan because it served "the private interests of Republican party entities rather than public interests exclusively."
In January, 1997 Gingrich faced ethics charges related to his use of charitable organizations to subsidize his partisan political activities. It was revealed that Gingrich and his top consultants had repeatedly attempted to use tax-deductible charitable donations to help promote political goals. The same month, the House of Representatives voted 395 to 28 to reprimand Gingrich, then Speaker of the House, and ordered him to pay an unprecedented $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing. Gingrich was charged with using a college course that he taught, called "Renewing American Civilization," to further his political agenda. When the House Ethics Committee questioned him about it, Gingrich made false ("glaringly inconsistent") statements regarding the charges. Five Democrats said they voted "present" -- neither for nor against the reprimand -- because they believed the sanction was not severe enough. It was the first time in the House's history that it had ever disciplined a speaker for ethical wrongdoing. [7] [8]
In December, 1998 Gingrich completed payment of a $300,000 penalty imposed for violations of House rules. Gingrich initially planned to pay the fine with a $300,000 loan from former Senate majority leader Robert J. Dole (R-Kan.). After Democrats and some commentators argued the loan was a "sweetheart deal" and amounted to a gift, Gingrich said he paid "through wholly personal funds." Gingrich admitted he misled the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct and should have sought better legal advice before using tax-exempt organizations to advance his political goals. [9] [10]
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Newt_Gingrich
Because she didn't fawn over him like all the other "journalists" at Fox Newts?
she wiped the drool off his face, made a sound argument, ran 5 circles around him, and schooled him. Well done. Just regretful she did not tell him that Trump's tape was legally obtained, Trump speaking himself, while Hillary's speeches were illegally obtained via sovereign hacking. Because that makes a BIG difference. Not that those Hillary files actually contain anything noteworthy. How much she is paid for speeches is completely irrelevant.
Last edited:
Gotta give kudos to Rubio for drawing the line he did re wikileaks. That's the straight truth, "next time it will be us".
Yes, but these patriots share a special kinship with Putin and are willing to overlook such inconvenient and annoying details.