That still wouldn't make me an expert.
I think you need to have fetal alcohol syndrome to perform whataboutatrics on the level of MPS & the gang.
This other arrest is timed for sure I reckon. I'd love to investigate it.
That still wouldn't make me an expert.
That still wouldn't make me an expert.
What you just said was what I thought (and hoped) you would say. Being an "expert" at Whataboutism is subjective, but it is my perception is that for a significant period of time, you engaged in it a lot on this board. Then again, nobody's perfect. Except for Trump. On some things related to making America great again. Some of the time. For now, anyway. As long as he doesn't go along the "stable genius" route in the future, that is.
I think you need to have fetal alcohol syndrome to perform whataboutatrics on the level of MPS & the gang.
This other arrest is timed for sure I reckon. I'd love to investigate it.
If you bring up whataboutism on every thread then you are an expert, if you search my posts, you will be hard pressed to find any whataboutism examples at all and certainly not in any frequency at which right wingers use here. Whataboutism and deflection is all they do.
Not enough to make impeachment worth it. Although the Democrats may still try. They need something more substantial. Besides, Trump's supporters are willing to accept a few warts from the man who is saving America.
Please enlighten us with your brilliant legal percipience, let us know what will constitute an impeachment worthiness? and what magnitude of evidence is required to substantiate such a process?