Media Take Break From Fear Mongering To Tell Us To Calm Down About Ebola

So basically, what we have here is yet another example of a judge substituting his personal policy preferences for the state's and dressing it up as some sort of constitutional right....
It's been going on for roughly a hundred years now.
 
Due to failed U.S. policy, the U.S. should expect more Ebola cases before the end of the year...

Scientists try to predict number of US Ebola cases

http://www.wral.com/scientists-try-to-predict-number-of-us-ebola-cases/14138492/

Top medical experts studying the spread of Ebola say the public should expect more cases to emerge in the United States by year's end as infected people arrive here from West Africa, including American doctors and nurses returning from the hot zone and people fleeing from the deadly disease.


But how many cases?


No one knows for sure how many infections will emerge in the U.S. or anywhere else, but scientists have made educated guesses based on data models that weigh hundreds of variables, including daily new infections in West Africa, airline traffic worldwide and transmission possibilities.


(More at above url)
 
Well, I think we can all agree that the main concern is that these people coming here from the hot zone should not suffer any inconvenience whatsoever. After all, unlike the soldiers who were sent there, they did it voluntarily and are thus heroes. Who are we to stigmatize them and rain on their parade of self-congratulation, just because they may be bringing in a deadly disease that we know little about, including most importantly, how it is spread?

The important thing here is to uphold one of liberalism's basic principles, which is that grandstanding do-gooders' get special rights and privileges, unless they are conservatives.
 
Back
Top