Shows what a dummy you are.
And believe me. The world would be a much much better place without Hillary in it. She's the worst of humanity
Media Shocked, Shocked I Tell You, Over Trump's Awfulness
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
Shows what a dummy you are.
And believe me. The world would be a much much better place without Hillary in it. She's the worst of humanity
As usual, Ann sums it up best. We now officially have a controlled media. There is no need to bother reading it or watching the news. You will get as much useful information from homeless people ranting on the sidewalk. Al jazeera or RT are more credible than our networks or newspapers of record.
******************************************
CASTING CALL FOR ANOTHER ANITA HILL
October 12, 2016
*Please note graphic language throughout the column.*
Donald Trumpis the only hope to save America, so the media have gone to war to stop him.
They don't care about being exposed as lying, hypocritical swine -- I'd describe them more fully, but it would require locker room talk. They'll win the public back later. Right now, all that matters is stopping Trump.
The same media that are pretending to consider the use of a bad word equivalent to rape don't give a fig about real rape, real sexual assault, real whoring, even real homicide, depending on who did it.
JFK was an STD-infected drug addict who cavorted with whores at the White House, but the media ferociously hid all this from the public, publishing fairy-tale versions of his presidency as "Camelot.”
And what happened to the 11-year rule? Trump said the word "p*ssy" 11 years ago, in a secretly recorded conversation. Eleven years before Sen. Teddy Kennedy ran for president, he killed a girl -- but he ran, not only without apology, but, indeed, as the Conscience of the Democratic Party.
Throughout 2009, good, decent Americans who happened to oppose Obamacare were called the name of a gay sex act hundreds of times on TV -- and that was just on MSNBC. CNN's Anderson Cooper made the reference explicit when he giggled, "It's hard to talk when you're tea-bagging.”
Among the people using this sexual slur were distinguished members of Congress such as U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez and Rep. Barney Frank. Were they fit to hold office?
Going way, way, way back to a few weeks ago, the same media gasping in horror at "p*ssy" sure didn't mind my being called a c*nt repeatedly on a Comedy Central broadcast. And when I say "didn't mind," I mean they thought it was awesome.
But saying "p*ssy" 11 years ago is over the line.
Cut the crap, media.
A few years ago, Sen. Al Franken joked on a Comedy Central roast about producer Rob Reiner butt-f*cking his children. Does Hillary think he's fit to be a U.S. senator? Is he fit enough for the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, but not the Senate Finance Committee?
None of these were leaks of secretly recorded conversations -- considered a hanging offense in the Clinton years. These vulgarities were intentionally, publicly broadcast by the same media that, today, pretend to need smelling salts after hearing "p*ssy."
At least this new puritanical standard explains why rappers like Jay Z are banned from the White House. Wait — what?
Perhaps realizing their Victorian virgin act wasn't cutting it, the media turned to their Pretend We Don't Understand English method of argument, and claimed that Trump was confessing to having committed a "sexual assault”!
Trump said: "When you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do any of that. (Laughter.)" Journalists turned this into "sexual assault" by being literal on the "grab" part, non-figurative on the "you" part -- and on the "they let you do it" part? Stone, cold deaf.
If "they let you do it," it's not an assault.
Like most of Trump's bragging, his loutish boast was not intended to be taken seriously, nor was it. Far from whipping out his pencil and carefully taking notes, "Access Hollywood"'s Billy Bush laughed. The gist of what Trump was saying is that -- hold onto your hats! -- women like to sleep with celebrities! I don't know if you've heard that before.
At least we're back to the media pretending to care about sexual assault -- until further notice.
This is the same media that ran interference for an actual sexual predatorin the White House, ignoring Bill Clinton's serial pants-dropping, groping and raping for nearly a decade, while gleefully vilifying his accusers, and would have been happy to continue if Bill Richardson had become president. Clinton talking about p*ssy was one of his more dignified moments, proudly attested to by his friend Vernon Jordan in a nationally broadcast interview with Mike Wallace.
In the pages of The New York Times, feminist icon Gloria Steinem announced the "one-free grope" rule, specially developed for the Clinton era.
Former Time magazine correspondent Nina Burleigh said of Clinton, "I would be happy to give him a bl*w job just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.”
Time magazine's Margaret Carlson said Linda Tripp had "lost membership in the family of man" for secretly tape-recording Monica Lewinsky. Tripp kept the recordings not for something so exalted as stopping Trump, but to protect herself from a charge of perjury.
Even when the law began to close in on the horny hick -- midway through the second term he won because of the media's heroic self-censorship -- the rest of us had to spend a year listening to liberals say “Guys like bl*w jobs,” “Everybody does it" and "Let's move on.”
When Clinton was credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick, NBC strategically held the story -- until a week after the Senate had voted in the rapist's impeachment trial. All the public could do was helplessly sport "Free Lisa Myers" buttons, referring to the investigative reporter who got the interview.
Explaining NBC's incomprehensible decision to hold its own investigative report, Myers told Broaddrick: "The good news is you're credible. The bad news is that you're very credible.”
At least NBC ran the story eventually. The name "Juanita Broaddrick" never crossed the lips of "CBS Evening News" anchor Dan Rather.
Asked by FNC's Bill O'Reilly why he never got around to mentioning that the commander in chief was, more likely than not, a rapist, Rather said, "When the charge has something to do with somebody's private sex life, I would prefer not to run any of it.”
So according to our media, committing a rape is "somebody's private sex life," but using a bad word is rape.
Poor Billy Bush has to be fired from NBC's "Today" show so the media can pretend that Trump's using bawdy language is a very, very serious offense.
Meanwhile, Billy's ex-president uncle and cousin openly fraternize with the rapist. The second President Bush calls Bill Clinton his "brother from another mother" and praises Clinton's "character" -- something even Clinton's defenders never did with a straight face.
Now the networks are holding casting calls for some loon willing to falsely accuse Trump of sexual assault, so they can hype it like the Duke lacrosse case, Mattress Girl and Rolling Stone's fraternity rape. Unfortunately -- for us, fortunately for the media -- by the time the truth comes out, the election will be over.
COPYRIGHT 2016 ANN COULTER
One can dismiss the public behavior of Trump as rude and coarse, and something most off us would rather not be characteristic of our president. For some, this is behavior that would keep them from voting for Mr. Trump.
Ms Coulter, however, either does not know of, or is intentionally avoiding mention of multiple, dead serious charges of child rape, with multiple witnesses having come forth, in which Donald Trump is a co-defendant, now awaiting a tolling decision from the court. Although the Huffington post published links to copies of the filings, the mainstream media has been, silent on this topic. These documents are part of the public record, so to report on them, it would seem, does not incur risk of a defamation charge, even though they may prove unfounded. Is the mainstream media protecting Mr. Trump in this instance? In any case , should this case be allowed to go forward despite its late filing, it could take many months to reach a jury. If Trump were to be elected, it could take years.
My personal reason for not even considering voting for Trump is that his proposals lack substance, and those few where some detail has emerged -- his tax proposals for example -- are, in my opinion, bad. The direct evidence of moral turpitude that has emerged to date merely bolsters my decision.
A hearing is scheduled for December 16th 2016 (to the best of my knowledge) there are multiple, similar suits pending. This is just one of them. One of the key witnesses is alleged to have been an employee of one of the defendants at the time of the alleged rapes of under age girls.
/www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits#fullscreen
Last edited:
Bill Clinton was a frequent guest of Epstein. He flew on his private plane and stayed at Epstein's island. No one cares.
Pie, you fancy yourself such a policy expert, tell me. How is bringing in millions of illiterate immigrants a benefit to our economy and to the low wage workers you care so deeply about? Trumps' tax plan is a proposal at best, and would have to go through congress, which is doubtful. Open borders and non-enforcement of immigration laws are a fact and Hillary has promised to amp it up more.
Pie, you fancy yourself such a policy expert, tell me. How is bringing in millions of illiterate immigrants a benefit to our economy and to the low wage workers you care so deeply about? Trumps' tax plan is a proposal at best, and would have to go through congress, which is doubtful. Open borders and non-enforcement of immigration laws are a fact and Hillary has promised to amp it up more.
No one cares because Bill is not up for election. But that's just besides the point that Bill's associations with Epstein to the degree you portray are pure fabrications and nowhere proven.
But hey, it's all too late. TRUMP's past caught up with him and he is going down, he has in fact already lost the election. Democrats just don't dare say it in order to not turn the vote of some crazies, who hate being told they do what they do anyway.
But hey, it's all too late. TRUMP's past caught up with him and he is going down, he has in fact already lost the election. Democrats just don't dare say it in order to not turn the vote of some crazies, who hate being told they do what they do anyway.
Last edited:
Piezoe just got fucking PWNED
Harboring, aiding and sheltering a pedophile and rapist is a felony. It should matter to you, because Hillary knew, you fucking maggot.
Not true and does not matter, Bill is not on the ballot. You are grasping for straws my friend.
Grasping at straws? Is that what you call the titanic sinking by pin pricks?
Hillary's corruption is vast
truly a titanic is sinking, a titanic of lies, bigotry, misogyny, business failures, and cons. We will see you at the other end of the tunnel. Hope you make it off the boat safely.