Media Lied again. Showed a pic from 830am. Misrepresented the crowd size. Fucking lying scum

Nanook said:
Another video (timelapse) of the day:
More...

That appears to be heavily edited.

Watch this video at time index 3:30.

The crowd goes all the way back and fills the white bleacher building by the Monument. The two videos do not match, at all.


 
achilles28 said:
That appears to be heavily edited.

Watch this video at time index 3:30.

The crowd goes all the way back and fills the white bleacher building by the Monument. The two videos do not match, at all.


More...

I like how he uses Obama's screenshot as clickbait
slider1obama_y99hl.jpg

 
Interesting take on why someone voted for Trump.
Generally, nobody likes bullies.
When this guy figured out that it was Trump who was being bullied, he went ballistic.
Screw Saul Alinsky.
In these types of wars, it's best to recognize it, declare it, and fight it openly.
Which is what Trump has done.


http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=368084
 
Here4money said:
facts are liberal ideas now?
More...

I understand that in the post-modern world of progressives, "facts" are considered elastic and always subject to interpretation, but we like to use the traditional definition, ie a fact is something that is objectively provable or verifiable.

Today's high temp is a fact. How many illegals voted in the election is not. You or some dirtbag reporter may disagree with Trump's number, but that doesn't make it incorrect. I have no problem with a reporter citing alternative sources that disagree with Trump's statements. That is called being even-handed, something the media used to pride themselves on being. No more.

It's like the debate over climate change and man's role in it. Conservatives understand the science perfectly well, ie they understand that AGW is an unproven theory, not an established fact like the media and activists try to convey.
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
I understand that in the post-modern world of progressives, "facts" are considered elastic and always subject to interpretation, but we like to use the traditional definition, ie a fact is something that is objectively provable or verifiable.

Today's high temp is a fact. How many illegals voted in the election is not. You or some dirtbag reporter may disagree with Trump's number, but that doesn't make it incorrect. I have no problem with a reporter citing alternative sources that disagree with Trump's statements. That is called being even-handed, something the media used to pride themselves on being. No more.

It's like the debate over climate change and man's role in it. Conservatives understand the science perfectly well, ie they understand that AGW is an unproven theory, not an established fact like the media and activists try to convey.
More...

Saying that millions of illegal votes were cast is wrong is as factual as saying 2-2=1 is wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top