Media Lied again. Showed a pic from 830am. Misrepresented the crowd size. Fucking lying scum

[jem]

I believe some of the self styled smart ones like to repeat the propaganda. They seem to think its cool to lie in service of the state. Like Gruber.

This also explains why the left does not like those who have a moral compass.

Yep, it's all been heading in this direction for awhile now. Essentially, this is how guys like Piezoe can rationalize away the election failure and the demise of the Democratic party. It's essential that they can hang onto their own "fake news" and label any independent organization as "fake news". He can smugly brush away all of the "fake poll's" leading up to the election with his own brand of propaganda.

Basically, we're so splintered as a country that we no longer even share legitimate news outlets...Think about that one for a minute.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

The media have developed an annoying habit. They have appointed themselves to "correct" what they view as lies by Trump in news articles. So instead of reporting that Trump said 3 million aliens voted for Hillary, they will also add that it is incorrect. They already employ so called fact checkers to perform this job, but now ordinary reporters do it freelance.

The problem is, they assume a consensus liberal position on things that are not subject to real proof, eg how many illegals voted or the extent of russian hacking. Then they purport to "correct" Trump, and Trump only, when he says something at odds with their conclusion. No wonder he is furious at them.

 

[piezoe]

they will also add that it is incorrect.

In the report I heard the reporter said "without evidence". Though I understand that "incorrect" and "without evidence" are not the same , you may not. But frankly the reporter was being unnecessarily cautious. He could have said "incorrect" with a virtually zero probability of being proven wrong. But frankly non of this matters. We elected a lunatic as President. That's what matters.

 

[piezoe]

This is just the forward to the first chapter in the "The Strange Presidency of Donald Trump." Wait until those agencies try to find money to build his "wall" without a specific appropriation from Congress. That will be entertaining. Then there is the loss of half a trillion in commerce between Mexico and the U.S. That will be entertaining. I can't wait to get into Chapter one. And by Chapter three we should get to the Court Room Drama. That will be super entertaining.
Donald Trump is headed for an Emmy!

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Though I understand that "incorrect" and "without evidence" are not the same , you may not.

I somehow can grasp that distinction, but I am reading "news" articles in the Wash Post written by people who do not.

 

[Nanook]

The video was taken during Trumps inauguration, you silly fuck.

Another video (timelapse) of the day:

 

[Cuddles]

The media have developed an annoying habit. They have appointed themselves to "correct" what they view as lies by Trump in news articles. So instead of reporting that Trump said 3 million aliens voted for Hillary, they will also add that it is incorrect. They already employ so called fact checkers to perform this job, but now ordinary reporters do it freelance.

The problem is, they assume a consensus liberal position on things that are not subject to real proof, eg how many illegals voted or the extent of russian hacking. Then they purport to "correct" Trump, and Trump only, when he says something at odds with their conclusion. No wonder he is furious at them.

facts are liberal ideas now?

 

[W.J. Feathermaker III]

facts are liberal ideas now?

Two sets of facts in this country now...no middle ground exists.

 

[Good1]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...ed-photos-diminish-trump’s-inauguration-crowd

 

[achilles28]

The media have developed an annoying habit. They have appointed themselves to "correct" what they view as lies by Trump in news articles. So instead of reporting that Trump said 3 million aliens voted for Hillary, they will also add that it is incorrect. They already employ so called fact checkers to perform this job, but now ordinary reporters do it freelance.

The problem is, they assume a consensus liberal position on things that are not subject to real proof, eg how many illegals voted or the extent of russian hacking. Then they purport to "correct" Trump, and Trump only, when he says something at odds with their conclusion. No wonder he is furious at them.

Another day, another psy-op.

Erode Trumps credibility on every level. Then make the argument he's a lying sack. It appears to me, they are trying to build a false case, to create a false consensus. Light on news, heavy on social engineering.