Keep your mind open: if that's what you believe, it doesn't mean it is so. A channel has a width, a slope, a structure, and the price it includes is obviously measurable.Quote from kut2k2:
... There are no measurements produced by channels and trendlines. They are utterly worthless for measuring trends. ...
It seems that you think your view of the trendlines merits is correct. Let me tell you that I know for a fact, that you're mistaken.Quote from kut2k2:
When I use a technical indicator, I automatically get a number aka a measurement. You're telling me I have to jump through all sorts of extra hoops to squeeze some sort of number out of trendlines. This comes across as archaic at best in the age of automated trading strategies.
That's not even accounting for the fact that trendlines are almost always useless for short-term trends. Whereas an indicator can generally be applied to a trend of any duration.
Until you explain how any of that translates into a measurement of trend, you've demonstrated nothing.Quote from baro-san:
Keep your mind open: if that's what you believe, it doesn't mean it is so. A channel has a width, a slope, a structure, and the price it includes is obviously measurable.
OK what's the minimum number of points you need to draw a reasonable trendline? I only need 4 bars for the KER.Quote from baro-san:
George C., post an example where they don't. You may be right (not).
Quote from kut2k2:
OK what's the minimum number of points you need to draw a reasonable trendline? I only need 4 bars for the KER.
Is a 4-bar trendline something that makes sense?
I don't know, and don't care enough to any testing myself. I assume those who do care about trendlines have done or are willing to do this testing themselves.