McDonalds Responds To Minimum Wage Protests

* ignorant? How did you draw that conclusion from what I wrote?
* student? Same question as above
* no experience? How so?
* never made much money? Because of what?

on ignore. What an idiot and that with 9000+ posts.

Man are you ignorant. I imagine you are a student with lots of arrogance and no experience-- right? Obviously someone who has never had much money-- otherwise you would get it.

Go back to your cubicle and think before you post--
 
The market (you and I and everyone you know) determine what McDonald's wages are. If we want to pay up for burgers and fries, I will guarantee McD's wages go up.

Workers will protest and McD's and other restaurants will find a way to streamline operations in order to reduce labor costs.

That's how the private sector works.
It is a little more complex I think. Generally the labor market itself has a lot to say about wages. When you have government stepping in to supplement abnormally low wages -- current minimum is over 30% lower than mid 1960s minimum, which qualifies the current wage as abnormal-- a somewhat distorted labor market can result, and the tax payer ends up subsidizing businesses by yet another subtle mechanism. Sometimes taxpayer subsidies make sense, sometimes they don't. Here is a case where we might be better off to create a labor market where real wages more closely reflect real costs.

______________
I am hoping no one is going to use data from the 19th century or the great depression to justify their idea of normal.
 
11350450_398695236980504_843404237644112995_n.jpg
 
The bottom line is you get paid what the market perceives your value to be. If you don't like your pay, up your value proposition or perception---- it's in your hands, no one else is responsible for your situation other than the person him or herself. surf
 
Right, because there's no such thing as social inequality and everyone is born equal. News to surf, the good 'ole USA is *not* egalitarian. There are literally generations of people who have to fight like hell to break out of the shit they're in. Do you think these people are even going to come from backgrounds that allows them to "up their value proposition" as if their parents are ready to pay for college right out of the gate?

Those who have the money do their damnedest to keep the money.
 
Right, because there's no such thing as social inequality and everyone is born equal. News to surf, the good 'ole USA is *not* egalitarian. There are literally generations of people who have to fight like hell to break out of the shit they're in. Do you think these people are even going to come from backgrounds that allows them to "up their value proposition" as if their parents are ready to pay for college right out of the gate?

Those who have the money do their damnedest to keep the money.
It isn't unusual for someone who asks "why don't they get off their ass and make something of themselves?", to have no interest in the answer. When the question is rhetorical it's because the one asking thinks they know the answer already; yet invariably they don't.
 
Last edited:
Right, because there's no such thing as social inequality and everyone is born equal. News to surf, the good 'ole USA is *not* egalitarian. There are literally generations of people who have to fight like hell to break out of the shit they're in. Do you think these people are even going to come from backgrounds that allows them to "up their value proposition" as if their parents are ready to pay for college right out of the gate?

Those who have the money do their damnedest to keep the money.


I completely disagree with you. Wealth does not discriminate and has nothing at all to do with college. You seem hung up on "college"--- there are plenty of folks with degrees making around minimum wage-- and plenty of college dropouts or even high school drop outs who are billionaires--

You get what you focus on and work smartly toward in this world--- anyone can make it provided desire, passion and smart work---

surf

Ps-- i know a freaking migrant worker who still speaks broken english who now runs a million $ per year landscaping biz. So enough of the blame game and weak excuses. peace.
 
Last edited:
$10 Big Macs coming soon to California?
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/15/mcd...criticizes-new-california-fast-food-bill.html
McDonald’s franchisee group says new California fast-food bill will cause ‘devastating financial blow’
PUBLISHED FRI, SEP 15 20231:08 PM EDTUPDATED FRI, SEP 15 20233:42 PM EDT
Kate Rogers@KATEROGERS
KEY POINTS
  • After California lawmakers passed a landmark fast-food bill, an independent advocacy group of McDonald’s owners is pushing back against what it says will be a “devastating financial blow” to its franchisees in the state, according to a memo viewed by CNBC.
  • The bill, AB 1228, was passed by the state Senate late Thursday and heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk for signature. He has pledged to sign it into law.
  • It includes a wage floor of $20 for California workers at fast-food chains with at least 60 locations nationwide, starting April 1.
In this article

107219798-1680571378661-gettyimages-1250754548-AA_04042023_1139784.jpeg

A McDonald’s fast food restaurant is seen in Belmont, United States on April 03, 2023.
Tayfun Coskun | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images
After California lawmakers passeda landmark fast-food bill, an independent advocacy group of McDonald’s owners is pushing back against what it says will be a “devastating financial blow” to its franchisees in the state, according to a memo to its membership viewed by CNBC.

The bill, AB 1228, was passed by the state Senate late Thursday and heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk for signature. He has already pledged to sign the bill into law. It includes a wage floor of $20 for California workers at fast-food chains with at least 60 locations nationwide, starting April 1.


Labor groups pushed for even higher wages in previous legislation, but the resulting $20 an hour floor prevailed. Even in a state where the minimum wage is $15.50 and the pay floor is even higher in some municipalities, the deal will bring a significant raise for many workers. But despite support from franchisee and restaurant advocacy groups, some owners are concerned about what the bill means for operations in a challenging labor market and during a period of high inflation.

The National Owners Association, an independent advocacy group of more than 1,000 McDonald’s owners, projects in the memo the bill will cost each restaurant in the state $250,000 annually. The group said the costs “simply cannot be absorbed by the business model.” It also warned similar legislation will follow in other states.

Further, the organization claimed in the letter that “a small coalition of franchisors, including McDonald’s, the National Restaurant Association (NRA) and the International Franchise Association (IFA) independently w/o franchisee involvement, negotiated a deal with the [Service Employees International Union]; causing the legislative outcome to now become certain.”

McDonald’s sent its own letter to its restaurant system on Monday, which was viewed by CNBC. Responding to the bill,the company said it and other franchisee groups “worked tirelessly over the past year to fight these policies and protect Owner/Operators’ ability to make decisions for their businesses locally and protect their restaurants and their crew.”

“This included forming a coalition of brands to refer [an earlier version of the bill] to California voters in November 2024 — while expensive and unexpectedwe felt we had no other choice. We also significantly increased our political engagement in the state. This included a newly established North America Impact Team to work horizontally, new lobbyists and campaign consultants, and a dramatic step-change in our political activity,” it wrote.


The company declined to comment further on the NOA’s letter or position.

Roger Delph, a McDonald’s franchisee from California who served on the state’s owner/operator task force, said in a statement to CNBC that he worked with McDonald’s, other franchisees and separate companies to “protect” the business model from what he called “an all-out attack.”

“That involved countless conversations and meetings, and a discussion with the Governor’s office directly,” he said. “Anyone who is suggesting this was not a collaborative and successful effort to protect the franchised business model in California, or that franchisee involvement was absent, was either not involved or is contorting the facts.”

In its systemwide letter, the fast-food giant also outlined changes made to the final version of the bill that are considered better for owners than the initial proposed legislation. The new legislation eliminated the threat of joint franchisor-franchisee liability, which McDonald’s said would “destroy the franchise model in California and strip thousands of restaurant owners of the right to run their business.”

In addition, it said the bill unwinds the reconstitution of the Industrial Welfare Commission, which would have “sweeping powers” over decisions on wages and workplace requirements for restaurants. The letter said the commission would have been able to make immediate and unchecked decisions on wages and working conditions in the state.

107301723-16948016131694801610-31209826398-1080pnbcnews.jpg

WATCH NOW
VIDEO03:18
SEIU President on raising minimum wage, expanding labor efforts and UAW’s strike

Other franchise and restaurant groups had a more positive outlook on the compromise.

The International Franchise Association CEO Matt Haller said in a statement that the bill “creates the best possible outcome for workers, local restaurant owners and brands, while protecting the franchise business model in California.” He added in an interview with CNBC, that “franchise brands that were involved in the negotiations had their franchisees first and foremost in front of minds as they were considering deal terms.”

The National Restaurant Association’s EVP of Public Affairs, Sean Kennedy, added in a statement, “This agreement provides a predictable future for California restaurant operators and includes a tremendous investment in the [quick-service restaurant] workforce, while eliminating regulatory and legislative threats endangering their businesses. We recognize the work from all sides that went into getting this legislation written and appreciate the legislature’s support to get it passed.”

Both Kennedy and Haller are co-chairs of the Save Local Restaurants coalition that worked on the negotiations.

Some critics of the deal have said costs will fall solely on small business owners in the state. In its letter, the NOA outlined ways for members, suppliers and McDonald’s corporate office to support owners in the state of California. It said anticipated menu prices hikes will create a “significant revenue windfall” for the company, and said the projected $80 million rent and service fees collected from those sales directly tied to price hikes should be reinvested in California restaurants. It asked that any and all requests for financial support made by owners in the state be considered.

“Everyone has a stake in this and nobody can afford to stand on the sidelines,” the NOA letter said.

Meanwhile, worker advocates — who won wage hikes but not increases as large as they first sought — said their work is just getting started.

“Fast-food workers’ fight in California isn’t close to over — it has only just begun as they prepare to take their seat at the table and help transform their industry for the better,” Service Employees International Union President Mary Kay Henry said in a statement to CNBC.

She added, “California’s Fast Food Council brings together every stakeholder in this industry, including franchisees. At this table, workers and franchisees alike will be heard by global franchisors and will have a direct role in shaping improved standards in the industry. This groundbreaking, sector-wide approach is the path to making fast-food jobs safer and the industry more sustainable for everyone.”
upload_2023-9-15_21-11-5.png

I remember when I thought they were overpiced at $1 each!
 
$10 Big Macs coming soon to California?
...
I remember when I thought they were overpiced at $1 each!

These greedy franchisees really should give the workers a decent wage for the crazy work they do, especially considering how much net wealth you have to have to become a franchisee to begin with. It's not like $250,000 is going to fucking hurt them in the pocketbook that much.

It's repetitive detailed work that requires a good deal of concentration.

Can you imagine doing this for 8 hours, day-after-day-after-day?

 
These greedy franchisees really should give the workers a decent wage for the crazy work they do, especially considering how much net wealth you have to have to become a franchisee to begin with. It's not like $250,000 is going to fucking hurt them in the pocketbook that much.
If the extra cost is really $250,000 per year, it could make a big difference to the franchisee.
https://www.mashed.com/178309/how-much-mcdonalds-franchise-owners-really-make-per-year/
Some McDonald's franchise owners are naturally going to make more than others, but most franchise owners still pull in an estimated yearly profit of roughly $150,000 (via Fox Business). A profit of $150,000 after $2.7 million in sales isn't even 6 percent, but after food cost, supplies, crew payroll, and about a dozen other costs handed down by corporate, that's what franchisees are left with (via Bloomberg).

If a McDonald's franchise wants to stay in business, it would probably need to pass the extra costs to the customers.
 
Back
Top