No but you are. I already gave you one warning.
McConnell to GOP - Come up with your own Defense regarding Trump
- Thread starter Spike Trader
- Start date
No but you are. I already gave you one warning.
Why don't we meet in person and you can give me your last warning? Now put me on ignore as you are scared of me.
Or whatever fool response you have in your tinfoil hat.
Last edited:
Some are saying its not quid pro quo
Some are saying its not quid pro quo,but even if it was its legal
Paul says it is quid pro quo and quid pro quo is legal
Kennedy says quid pro quo is illegal but Trump might not have been in his right mind so it wouldn't be illegal for him
Some are saying its not quid pro quo,but even if it was its legal
Paul says it is quid pro quo and quid pro quo is legal
Kennedy says quid pro quo is illegal but Trump might not have been in his right mind so it wouldn't be illegal for him
Last edited:
The thing about Trump attacking the (two) whistlebowers so hard when even his supporters see the pair's roles as over is to suppress further whistleblowers on other matters.
I don't see why he can't be charged in parallel with other impeachable offences.
I don't see why he can't be charged in parallel with other impeachable offences.
Last edited:
OK, you get your wish. On ignore. Like most on the left, you personalize everything. Eventually, that gets tiresome.
Constantly calls for women and kids to be massacred by "walls of lead" etc. I "personalize everything". hahahaah
The thing is by suggesting we meet I actually did intimidate him just there.
Tinfoil AAA.
Last edited:
"Remember, the Ukrainians got their defense aid – which was in addition to defense aid President Trump was already providing to them, aid that President Obama denied for years, with no objection from Democrats, despite Russian aggression. The Ukrainians did not have to agree to investigate the Bidens to get the aid."
-Andrew McCarthy
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/impeachment-question-trump-andrew-mccarthy
-Andrew McCarthy
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/impeachment-question-trump-andrew-mccarthy
There is no need for a defense strategy. The burden is on the dems to first establish a case. So far, the very worst interpretation of the transcript is Trump was manipulating a government program to his political benefit. That is called politics, and last time I checked, was perfectly legal. The other leg of their argument, advanced by several Deep state operatives in the administration, was that the aid was vital to US security, a claim so ludicrous it needs no refuting.