McCain suspends campaign asks to delay debates

Quote from MandelbrotSet:

Now that is ass-backwards thinking if ever I've heard it.

By voting with Bush 90% of the time?[/QUOTE]

McCain was 35th out of 48 Republican senators in voting with Bush. Once you take out the New England crowd, Ron Paul, some other blue republicans that is pretty low.
 
Quote from Moe27:

the old man can only do one thing at a time, and this is the guy you want in the white house.

No, I just want the other guy in the White House even less.
 
Quote from cuz69:

Hold on a sec here Big Dave,

First off
McCain sided with Bush on many issues, yes.
But... and I emphasize "BUT" he did not support him on some crucial issues. So that is not a fair assement, if some of McCains votes were on meaningless votes anyway.

That could be true, but unfortunately for McCain, he voted for all of the Bush White House's bloated budgets.

Then, and worst of all, he voted for Bush with respect to torture, after opposing the same policies.


McCain has not publicly supported or opposed the "Bailout".
And the average people that I see or speak with(who know nothing about Wall St. or trading)are adimantly opposed to the government helping "Wall St."

So if McCain opposes it or supports it with certain conditions, I think the average Joe will commend him for it... regardless of their political party.

Then you'll be happy to hear that he has both supported and opposed it.

"From Business Week:

" Both Presidential contenders have also said such an approach was needed. "I am calling for the creation of the Mortgage & Financial Institutions Trust—the MFI," Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) said Sept. 18.

"Which is, for all intents and purposes, a bail out."

Then:

"According to MSNBC:

"John McCain said Friday the Federal Reserve needs to stop bailing out failed financial institutions."
 
Quote from Mercor:

By voting with Bush 90% of the time?

McCain was 35th out of 48 Republican senators in voting with Bush. Once you take out the New England crowd, Ron Paul, some other blue republicans that is pretty low.


Well that's a fair comment -- and it should give you an idea of how much the Republican Senators have abdicated their responsibility to vote independently instead of just blanket voting for the party - when the vast majority voted over 90% of the time with Bush.

That's a perfect example of crippling the checks and balances which make up the system.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

No, I just want the other guy in the White House even less.

Because:

1) He's a Muslim and Muslim means bad

2) He's going to increase my taxes, despite http://obamataxcut.com showing that for most filers he'll reduce taxes

3) He graduated at the top of his class, while his opponent graduated at the bottom of his class.

4) Because he's "liberal" and the budget will increase, and so it makes sense to vote for the more fiscally conservative Republicans who just doubled the entire debt of the country in eight years.

5) He's black
 
Back
Top