McCain Concedes Florida

Quote from OldTrader:

Young people gonna be paying through the nose for a long long time. I don't know if this country will make it to be honest. GWB and the republicans did a lousy job of restraint. Democrats though aren't any better, and won't be in the future.

My guess is that the turn toward capitalism that began in 1982 is now officially over...and will be inaugurated with an Obama election. Get ready for less freedom, more taxes, and large government for probably the rest of your life.

OldTrader
More...





yep , like I stated above.

this fool is the average right turd imbecile.

" Get ready for less freedom, more taxes, and large government for probably the rest of your life."


Yeah, bush already did a number on those. You fucking god damned numb nut.



<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/8527/120m447ra5.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/></a>
 
Quote from arealpissedgoy:

yep , like I stated above.

this fool is the average right turd imbecile.

" Get ready for less freedom, more taxes, and large government for probably the rest of your life."


Yeah, bush already did a number on those. You fucking god damned numb nut.



<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/8527/120m447ra5.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/></a>
More...


That's a genuinely fantastic graph.

This represents my frustration with trying to understand a Republican Party, still having a die-hard base (although diminishing), that talks one talk (low taxes, low spending, non-interventionist in global affairs, including military 'adventures'), but walks a completely different walk, and no one is ever held accountable for the dichotomy between what they say and what they do - NO ONE.

WTF? George W. Bush just doubled the national debt (roughly) from 5.6 trillion to 10.4 trillion (it may be 11 trillion+ by the time he actually leaves office in three months), spent what Stiglitz has estimated will be 3 trillion in direct and indirect funding of the Iraq War (where, honestly, has that gotten us? What ROI will we be rewarded with as taxpayers for the Iraq FUBAR War?), and the bastard Republican Party has the GINORMOUS BALLS to claim the mantle of fiscal conservativism in this election cycle, EVEN WHILE FRONTING A BIG SPENDER like JOHN McCain!!!!!!!!!!!!!




WTF!!!!!!!!!
 
Quote from arealpissedgoy:

yep, yet another imbecile.


how are you paying for the 1 trillion bailout?

or the 1 trillion war bill?

he's going to pay it the same way bush is paying for his nonsensical wars and endless wall street welfare programs

so where's Osama?

Oh wait, Bush has stated several times he doesn't care where Osama is.
More...

So let me see if I got this straight dumbass:

Democrats, let by Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Chuck Schumer, et al, did not want the bailout? LOL. Take your head out of your ass one of these days and read the newspaper you twit.

Did any of the Democrats vote for the Iraq war, and later authorize spending? LOL.

OldTrader
 
Quote from OldTrader:

So let me see if I got this straight dumbass:

Democrats, let by Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Chuck Schumer, et al, did not want the bailout? LOL. Take your head out of your ass one of these days and read the newspaper you twit.

Did any of the Democrats vote for the Iraq war, and later authorize spending? LOL.

OldTrader
More...




you seem to have an issue with cognitive reasoning.

probably because you're senile.


Bush essentially put a gun to Congress and said pay up.

Kind of like how he did with Iraq. No money for war, Armageddon tomorrow.

Few months later the imbecile gets on TV and says he essentially doesn't give a shit about osama.

So here you have the guy who essentially is supposed to be privy to all information telling everyone Armageddon is going to happen tomorrow if "money is not lossened" (sic).

Yeah, I'm sure bush had nothing to do with it.

Back to being senile. Go take your meds.

Btw, do you still believe Iraq was behind 911?
 
Since only the House of Representatives have the power to make a budget, overlay that chart on top of the party in control of the House.

Also, overlay it over defense spending. You will find that as the Republicans strengthened the military the Democrats only would sign off if they were able to increase their wasteful spending. Certainly a rough deal to make but the Democrats didn’t care because they love giving money to the unproductive elements of society.
 
I don't understand the incredible hypocrisy from McCain supporters.

Help me out, anyone.

You are criticizing Obama for voting to pass the 'bailout bill,' but McCain goes unscathed despite not only voting the same way as Obama, but leaning on Republican holdouts to do so?
 
Quote from Mercor:

Since only the House of Representatives have the power to make a budget, overlay that chart on top of the party in control of the House.

Also, overlay it over defense spending. You will find that as the Republicans strengthened the military the Democrats only would sign off if they were able to increase their wasteful spending. Certainly a rough deal to make but the Democrats didn’t care because they love giving money to the unproductive elements of society.
More...




and here I was thinking it was more of an overlay with the moon's axis around the sun.

So I suppose the democratic congress is the cause of the economic boom in the Reagan years?

well in that case, why aren't you voting democrats into office?
 
Quote from arealpissedgoy:

you seem to have an issue with cognitive reasoning.

probably because you're senile.


Bush essentially put a gun to Congress and said pay up.

Kind of like how he did with Iraq. No money for war, Armageddon tomorrow.

Few months later the imbecile gets on TV and says he essentially doesn't give a shit about osama.

So here you have the guy who essentially is supposed to be privy to all information telling everyone Armageddon is going to happen tomorrow if "money is not lossened" (sic).

Yeah, I'm sure bush had nothing to do with it.

Back to being senile. Go take your meds.

Btw, do you still believe Iraq was behind 911?
More...

Too late, he probably already took his meds and is under sedation.:D Rest assured though, that he will not fail to get back to you and me tomorrow in his usual friendly manner. You've got to remember that this is no ordinary mortal, this is the ego troll you're dealing with. He always has to have the last word. Every darn reply of his will have "LOL" in it. He loves laughing out loud. Senile? I'd say so. More than that, I honestly think some of his marbles are missing.:p I reiterate that both of us will hear from him in no uncertain terms in the very near future.
 
Quote from arealpissedgoy:

and here I was thinking it was more of an overlay with the moon's axis around the sun.

So I suppose the democratic congress is the cause of the economic boom in the Reagan years?

well in that case, why aren't you voting democrats into office?
More...

We can conclude that deficits have little effect on a economic booms. We have had booms with surplus ,we have had booms with deficits.

Deficits do not matter. Deficits only affect how much meddling the government can do in the private sector. I say keep the government broke and see less harm done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top