Did John Mccain follow the correct procedure when he came into the possession of info disputing the legality of Obama's identity documents?
The sheriff in a city in his own state has called the obama birth certificate forged, and he did so after an investigation. There's also the matter of Obama using a ssn that was assigned to someone in Connecticut.
But what did John Mccain do? Not a damn thing.
The courts claimed that one needed standing to dispute Obama's birth documents. And John Mccain is the only person who has undisputed standing, as the loser in the election. Iow, he's virtually the only person who could legally contest Obama's documents, according to the courts.
I'm not going to argue obama's birth certificate, which I feel is not legit, because without a court order to see the original docs, nobody can do anything but argue all day. But how does any honest person get around the ssn number obama uses being assigned to someone in Conn?
He's the only person the courts said could contest, and that mf scumbag didn't do it.
Yet he 'passes on' this obvious bunch of bs to the FBI, to fulfill his 'obligation'.
He sold out his party in 08, and now he's selling out his party in 16.
Some ethics.
Time to visit Snopes or any other fact checking website to sort out the fact from the fiction.
Stolen Security
Barack Obama did not appropriate the Social Security number of a dead man born in 1890 and use it as his own.
"Likewise, the claim that Social Security numbers beginning with 042 are "reserved for Connecticut residents" is false."
http://www.snopes.com/POLITICS/OBAMA/birthers/ssn.asp
BTW - using the same standards applied to Obama... I have a SSN "reserved" for use in Iowa. Neither my parents or myself have ever been to Iowa. Nor do I know anyone there.