Quote from Max401'sShrink:
Yes, you are correct. It is the listeners, not the speakers that are of low intelligence. Absolutely. The whole listening audience of the extremely liberal media is just hopeless. This is why, despite the fact that we all KNOW the media is very liberal, the majority of commentators are conservatives. They appeal to an audience with greater purchasing power, and hence generate greater advertising revenues.
How else can you explain the "liberal media" being essentially devoid of liberal commentators? Now Rush Limbaugh, he was able to really draw a crowd!!
Best,
Dr. S.
The answer is not only obvious, but borne out by survey and empirical evidence. Liberals don't bother to pay anywhere near as much attention to news, current events or facts. To wit: NPR, a staunchly liberal news source, has a majority of
conservative listeners, and so it is on down the line. Why do you think Donahue got canned? Hardly anyone watched the show. Do you get that point?
liberals were not tuned in. Not because Donahue sucked per se, liberals don't pay attention, their too busy copying what Hollywood actors are "thinking." This is a well known fact. Where have you been? Well, of course this is new to you, you don't pay attention either.
Again from my favorite columnist:
"If liberals cared about ideas or knew any facts, they would cease being liberals. Even the audience for the left's government-supported radio network, National Public Radio, has more conservative listeners than liberal listeners. According to a Pew Research Center study released last summer, conservatives consume far more news than liberals -- including listening to NPR and watching PBS more than liberals. (As Mickey Kaus said, "No wonder conservatives are so pi--ed off.")
Liberalism thrives on ignorance. Their media are "Lifetime: TV for Women," NBC's "The West Wing" and 4 billion "Law and Order" episodes in which the perp turns out to be a Christian, white male who recites the Second Amendment before disemboweling a poor minority child. "
