Quote from volente_00:
So roughly $900 profit from commission markup had this been a live account whether austin made or lost money.
Below is CL only, all days verbatim except for 10/12 (*) where initial peak equity +$3,100 by 8am est was run back down to net loss:
10/09: +1,920 / 16 contracts
10/10: +2,350 / 50 contracts
10/11: (-2,420) / 70 contracts
10/12: +3,100 / 24 contracts*
10/15: +3,920 / 40 contracts
10/16: (-470) / 40 contracts
10/18: +2,490 / 90 contracts
10/19: +3,870 / 90 contracts
----------------------------------
total: +14,760 net / 420 contracts = (2,100)
In this round of eight full sessions, commission cost was 12% of gross gains (16,860) or 14% of net trade results [2100 ~ 14760] however one wishes to view it.
Quite a bit of that was churn, trading past peak profits for the day in attempts to balance out poor ZS performance and/or attempts to keep "pace" with combine profit objective. I would expect going forward to cut round turns by 1/3 to 1/2 and maintain or improve daily results in that process. But I never want to hinder my thinking with trade cost concerns.
Days when the morning is a struggle and I've scratched thru 70 contracts for nil gain or loss, the reamaining 10 - 20 contracts can easily hit that one or two directional swings to wind up $2,000+ to $4,000+ in the end. Fixating on costs and worrying about "saving" $50 or $100 in turns can result in purposely missing $1,000s of realized gains on the other side. Cost concerns are important for scalpers and dead-chop symbols like ES where margins are razor thin.
CL trading is all about catching chunks of distance on larger size... while scratching out of sideways trades in smaller size. It requires a decidedly different attitude, one like the mindset of internet stock traders in the glory days of 1998 thru 2001. That pretty much describes CL trading from 1999 thru 2012 and beyond. It never changed... and it never will
