Quote from Mike805:
None of the metrics for trader evaluation are reasonable. I say this as I can provide a track record trading futures (YM, ES, US, CL, TY) profitably for the last 4 years. These are efficient and difficult markets that require substantial skill. Anything over 20% yearly is fantastic IMO and to consistently make $3500 in 10 days with a $1000 loss limit is pure bullshit.
Let's examine this for accuracy:
"None of the metrics for trader evaluation are reasonable."
That's your opinion. If I were looking for top trading talent, I'd have very similar metrics. Why screen for mediocrity?
"I say this as I can provide a track record trading futures (YM, ES, US, CL, TY) profitably for the last 4 years."
We have no way of knowing if this is true, but we'll take you at your word.
"These are efficient and difficult markets that require substantial skill."
I agree with you that the markets are difficult and definitely require substantial skill.
"Anything over 20% yearly is fantastic IMO and to consistently make $3500 in 10 days with a $1000 loss limit is pure bullshit."
Pure opinion and the facts say otherwise. TST has funded traders who successfully attained this goal in the combine, so how is that pure bullshit? And if a trader can do this in 10 days out of 30 with a $50K account, why is it fantastic to think they can't do that each month, giving them a yearly return of several times your personal limited belief?
I have no doubt you're a consistently profitable trader, but what you have been able to do personally is not a bar above which all others are guaranteed to find insurmountable resistance.