Validation on historical data does not guarantee future profitability.
So let's not backtest anything and trade on hunches, tips, feeling, emotions and rely on our infallible inborn sixth sense instead.
Validation on historical data does not guarantee future profitability.
So let's not backtest anything and trade on hunches, tips, feeling, emotions and rely on our infallible inborn sixth sense instead.
Hindsight is always 20/20.
So then we should all forget about technical analysis because it is BS, and any attempt to validate TA through backtesting is BS because it is all based on hindsight? Maybe we should listen to John Bogle and just buy and hold equities and forget any kind of market timing or trading.
Well that happens to be a good idea. I would actually bet that most people on ET do just that with the majority of their investment portfolio.
Pulling data forward and making inferences about it is a difficult thing to do
So much so, that it is pointless to do it when low hanging fruit exists.
True but what else is there to go on? We've always counted on the past (aka experience) to help us deal with the future. Why should trading be an exception to how we deal with the future in the rest of our lives? Don't let a legalistic disclaimer dissuade you from benefiting from experience.Validation on historical data does not guarantee future profitability.
Never mind Ron. You twisted my words into something I did not say nor imply. Enjoy your weekend. Unsubscribe...
True but what else is there to go on? We've always counted on the past (aka experience) to help us deal with the future. Why should trading be an exception to how we deal with the future in the rest of our lives? Don't let a legalistic disclaimer dissuade you from benefiting from experience.
"Why would we look to the past in order to prepare for the future? Because there is nowhere else to look." -- James Burke
It is true that for most people this is the only alternative but there are other, more sophisticated choices.