Materialists

Quote from stu:

Then if man sows the seeds of rationality and reasonableness, so shall he reap the logical result that 'we' can conclude there is no reason to pre-suppose God by assumption and moreover, the lack of something is likely to be unable to judge anything... whether fairly or otherwise.

Not sure exactly what you're saying, but let's take the SDA case. You live a "rational and reasonable" life by your definition, i.e. you're a "pretty nice guy":

Sometime after the end of your life you are judged and sometime thereafter your life is taken away. This is exactly what you "want" and how you view life right now. As a materialist, you believe that your life will end after your time here on planet earth anyway. So I don't see the objection as you essentially would be given exactly what you want and expect...
 
Quote from Turok:

Shoe:
>And, guys, if the Seventh Day Adventists are right
>about hell, then many of the standard objections to
>hell vaporize.

I'm sorry Shoe, I've heard you say that before and I just have to call you out on it.

The only significant difference between the SDA version of hell and the standard christian "Miltonian" version of hell is the length of time spent there. The SDAs teach that the time will be commesurate with your deeds(the worse your life, the more time you spend) rather than "forever". They STILL believe in the LITERAL lake of fire that will LITERALLY burn you to death. At a minimum it will be the practical equivilent of being burned at the stake

So, you can say the "objections vaporize", but mine sure as hell don't. I don't believe that it is fair to be burned AT ALL for living a respectful, helpful life. Imagine that.

JB

Hmmm...I didn't know that about the lake of fire part. That's one of my exasperations with most Christians: they take apocryphal and/or vision/dream language and turn it into something literal for which it was not necessarily intended. That's a big subject that I think would bore most materialists into a comatose state since they don't accept the Bible as true anyway.

So I guess what I'll say is that we have very little to go on as to what hell will be like, but imo the fire will not generally be a literal flesh-searing, Miltonian fire. (Okay, it might get a little toasty for Uday Hussein...)

Let me ask this question: why would anyone assume that God would use a earthly fire (as we're used to it down here) to destroy human spirits/souls? The "fire" that will be used would certainly be beyond our knowledge here on earth - it's not going to the byproduct of carbon combusion, right?!?
 
Quote from stu:

As the story goes isn't it that God created sin, ensured people would sin, and knowing people must sin , he sends Christ to be killed for the sin God himself caused and created. So then God punishes Christ/himself/people, as atonement for all people, who God caused to be sinful in the first place.

2. If you commit murder here in this life on this earth you will probably be punished here on this earth. The punishment will most likely come from the state, other people or maybe even yourself. The only way God is involved in this is maybe the way he created us or if He influenced our laws, then through that avenue.

That's a big involvement isn't it? But reckless at least, to create mankind as sinful then leave it to them to be sinful!

3. Now if you or anyone else does as you say and is fair and kind etc. then all should go well for them here which is as I see it is fine with God as He set it up that way. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" " Love thy neighbor as thyself". etc.

But God isn't said to have set it up that way. He set it up that all people would be born with sin. It could equally be that God's intention is that you should be sinful. To be fair and kind does not need God. I don't see it as fine with God, when God made things so that mankind had to be sinful. it sounds like it would be more fine with him if people sinned.

4. If you decide not to accept Christ's death for your sins and want to be seperate from God for eternity then that is also your choice. It is totally up to you. There may be consequences for this decision but it is totally up to you to weigh the choices. This is much like the decision to murder. If you don't like the consequences then there are other avenues such as not murdering.

When you say "accept Christ's death for your sins" I take it you mean believing Christ died for (payment of?) peoples' sin. If he did then apparently the debt is somehow paid. so it's ok by God to sin now.
Apart from that, apparently Christ's death didn't work. God killed himself or his son for something he created himself, but then left in tact the very thing Christ is supposed to have died for.

Deciding not to fall for this story is much like the decision to murder. Are you sure about that?? I think such extreme comparison signifies a tendency on your part to over dramatize for the sake of effect. Finding no reason to accept mythical stories, is hardly comparable to finding reason not to murder.

For now you have made the right and noble decision to live here innocently to the best of your ability which is a very good decision. The rest is totally in your hands and is nobodies business except yours. It is kind of like having ones cake and eating it too. It may not be possible to totally reject God and yet share in all the benefits He promises. If you don't want to be near God then He will honor your desire and not force Himself on you. And that seems fair to me.

I suppose a threat of eternal damnation, whether implied or expressed directly as in the Bible, is not actually forcing anyone. However religionists make it their business to use as much linguistic force (myth with murder , non complience with eternal torture) by stating what they know is right. But to choose to be near something or someone which is described as much a homicidal, despotic, tyrannical, megalomaniac, as a loving creator of everything.. is a complete non starter. Surely one would have to be actually forced to accept such unacceptable circumstances, were the myth to turn into reality.
___________________________________________

I think I am hearing that you already made your decision. If so then that is fine. So you can now leave the rest of us to face the consequences of our decisions.
 
Shoe on biblical hell:
>There is a deliberate silence...

A: Let's say there IS silence (there isn't) -- the evidence to support that this silence is "deliberate" is what?

B: The references in the word of god to hell as a fiery place are available repeatedly in BOTH the old and new testament. How many times must he speak in regards to this subject before one concludes that there IS NO silence, let alone "deliberate silence"?

JB


Quote from ShoeshineBoy:

It could be that hell is complete destruction as the SDA's postulate. Or it could be that hell is somewhat like the sometimes - I'd like to say most of the time - nightmarish world of those who practice out-of-body experiences. Or it could be something completely different. But that's just it: we don't know. There is a deliberate silence...
 
Just so everyone knows, Shoe's example is NOT the SDA version. I know this because every relative I have, coming and going for generations on both sides of the family are SDA -- well, except for those few of us who have strayed. :-) Both of my brother-in-laws plus many other relatives are SDA ordained ministers.

In the SDA version, your "life is taken away" alright. BY A LAKE OF FIRE!!!!!!!!!

JB

Quote from ShoeshineBoy:

Not sure exactly what you're saying, but let's take the SDA case. You live a "rational and reasonable" life by your definition, i.e. you're a "pretty nice guy":

Sometime after the end of your life you are judged and sometime thereafter your life is taken away. This is exactly what you "want" and how you view life right now. As a materialist, you believe that your life will end after your time here on planet earth anyway. So I don't see the objection as you essentially would be given exactly what you want and expect...
 
Both of my brother-in-laws plus many others relatives are SDA ordained ministers.
Turok
____________________________________________

Gee, who can blame you for your aversion to Christianity.
:D :D :D

Please take this as feeble attempt at humor.
 
Quote from Turok:

Just so everyone knows, Shoe's example is NOT the SDA version. I know this because every relative I have, coming and going for generations on both sides of the family are SDA -- well, except for those few of us who have strayed. :-) Both of my brother-in-laws plus many other relatives are SDA ordained ministers.

In the SDA version, your "life is taken away" alright. BY A LAKE OF FIRE!!!!!!!!!

JB

I'm sorry for misrepresenting the SDA position, although I think it is a minor point. Regardless, this only proves my point: there is so little written about the afterlife for those who reject God that there is widespread speculation...

Think about it: we have several passages describing heaven, i.e. streets of gold, etc. Where is a similar description of hell?
 
Quote from Doubter:I think I am hearing that you already made your decision. If so then that is fine. So you can now leave the rest of us to face the consequences of our decisions.
Doubter,

You may well be hearing that very thing, but it is not what message boards, communication between people or logical discussion is about.
You are doing the equivalent of jumping in the pool, taking a wee, then climbing out whilst shouting "leave the rest of us to face the consequences of our peeing".

My interest is, why you feel you have to pee in the water first off.
 
LOL. No offense taken Doubter.

While of course we are all greatly affected by our pasts I like to think that my "aversion to christianity" comes from my years of study AFTER I left the cult environment in which I was raised.

JB

Quote from Doubter:

Both of my brother-in-laws plus many others relatives are SDA ordained ministers.
Turok
____________________________________________

Gee, who can blame you for your aversion to Christianity.
:D :D :D

Please take this as feeble attempt at humor.
 
Back
Top