Masters of Fake News Conservatives Push 2015 bribery case as evidence of Uranium One corruption

who has established that the amount shipped was small?
not only is your argument stupid... it lacks foundation.
Plus, you are making up arguments. Putin might of given the Clintions million of dollars for many reasons. But, you can bet it was not because he thought it was a good foundation.

Nothing but corruption would stop the DOJ from investigating. you are the one making the implicit argument that Clinton must be innocent because there are not investigations. That is a ridiculous argument and I just explained some of the reasons why.

You can't fault me for k knocking down your weak arguments.
 
jem said:
who has established that the amount shipped was small?
not only is your argument stupid... it lacks foundation.
Plus, you are making up arguments. Putin might of given the Clintions million of dollars for many reasons. But, you can bet it was not because he thought it was a good foundation.

Nothing but corruption would stop the DOJ from investigating. you are the one making the implicit argument that Clinton must be innocent because there are not investigations. That is a ridiculous argument and I just explained some of the reasons why.

You can't fault me for k knocking down your weak arguments.
More...

These guys have - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...at-russia-obtained-20-percent-of-our-uranium/

Read it and weep how dumb your conspiracy theory is. Nobody cares for that amount of Uranium, there is no shortage and it has no national security implications at all.

Also, WHY aren't you calling out the fake news?

The recent indictment has nothing to do with U1 but you keep ignoring that? LOL
 
Once again you are lying your ass off. Your article updates their bullshit with this...

"The Hill newspaper, citing documents, reported on Nov. 2 that some of the uranium from Uranium One facilities was exported to Europe. We had noted before that the uranium could not be exported, with the exception of yellowcake being shipped to Canada for conversion with the expectation it would be returned to the United States. But once Uranium One’s material arrived in Canada, it apparently was mixed with yellowcake from other suppliers – and then Canada received permission from the Energy Department to send converted U.S. uranium to Europe for enrichment. Uranium One says it sold about 25 percent of its U.S.-extracted yellowcake via “book transfer” to customers overseas—which does not necessarily mean the material moved because ownership in commodity markets is not the same as possession. U.S. officials say it is unknown whether any uranium extracted by Uranium One was transferred"


1. There is zero information to confirm your only 000001 claim or whatever bullshit number you used. You have no idea how much uranium went overseas.

2. A book transfer does not mean not necessarily mean the product did not ship... but even if it did not ship - since uranium is fungible it means that "our" uranium moved into a facility in Canada and the same amount moved out of control to putin's people in Europe. hence our uranium became putin's uranium.

exGOPer said:
These guys have - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...at-russia-obtained-20-percent-of-our-uranium/

Read it and weep how dumb your conspiracy theory is. Nobody cares for that amount of Uranium, there is no shortage and it has no national security implications at all.

Also, WHY aren't you calling out the fake news?

The recent indictment has nothing to do with U1 but you keep ignoring that? LOL
More...
 
jem said:
Once again you are lying your ass off. Your article updates their bullshit with this...

"The Hill newspaper, citing documents, reported on Nov. 2 that some of the uranium from Uranium One facilities was exported to Europe. We had noted before that the uranium could not be exported, with the exception of yellowcake being shipped to Canada for conversion with the expectation it would be returned to the United States. But once Uranium One’s material arrived in Canada, it apparently was mixed with yellowcake from other suppliers – and then Canada received permission from the Energy Department to send converted U.S. uranium to Europe for enrichment. Uranium One says it sold about 25 percent of its U.S.-extracted yellowcake via “book transfer” to customers overseas—which does not necessarily mean the material moved because ownership in commodity markets is not the same as possession. U.S. officials say it is unknown whether any uranium extracted by Uranium One was transferred"


1. There is zero information to confirm your only 000001 claim or whatever bullshit number you used. You have no idea how much uranium went overseas.

2. A book transfer does not mean not necessarily mean the product did not ship... but even if it did not ship - since uranium is fungible it means that "our" uranium moved into a facility in Canada and the same amount moved out of control to putin's people in Europe. (in terms of damage to our security interest - its the same thing as shipping the uranium from canada to europe.
More...


TO EUROPE

and that too A BOOK TRANSFER

What has this got ANYTHING to do with your conspiracy that Putin paid millions to control Uranium? Is Putin running Europe now? Do US authorities don't know who the book transfer was made to? If it went to Russia, why doesn't Trump admin reveal that info?

You are reduced to arguing irrelevant facts that has got nothing to do with your central conspiracy that Clinton was bribed to give Putin control.
 
jem said:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...of-uranium-company.html?mtrref=www.google.com


As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top