marriage and government
- Thread starter Gordon Gekko
- Start date
More dodging the issue on your part.
Why won't you answer the question?
I could ridicule you for not answering the question, but that isn't necessary. Maybe you have a very good reason.
Let's hear it.
Why won't you answer the question?
I could ridicule you for not answering the question, but that isn't necessary. Maybe you have a very good reason.
Let's hear it.
A core issue is your position on sexual relationships and what are considered taboo sexual acts, and the relationship of these acts to the concept of morality, marriage, etc.. That was the basis of this thread. Much was discussed of prostitution, which was defended by the agnostics, which is considered a sin and a moral wrong by the Judeo Christian thinkers.
You outlined your definition of sex, and placed it in a category of having no moral consequences, especially those moral consequences that relate to Judeo Christian thought and existing laws based in Judeo Christian belief systems.
If we see in nature acts of animals having sex with different species of animals, animals having sex with direct family members, old animals having sex with young immature animals, etc., why would you not just come out and say you support such behavior in human beings on a purely rational basis, free from the restriction of taboos or Judeo Christian morality?
Why are you avoiding addressing the issue of your position on bestiality, incest, adults having sex with underage children with the consent of the child, and zoophilia?
If sex is just physical stimulation of pleasure centers, what is the problem in "going down that road" with these issues?
You aren't afraid to go there, are you? Why do you refuse to tell us what your position is?
You outlined your definition of sex, and placed it in a category of having no moral consequences, especially those moral consequences that relate to Judeo Christian thought and existing laws based in Judeo Christian belief systems.
If we see in nature acts of animals having sex with different species of animals, animals having sex with direct family members, old animals having sex with young immature animals, etc., why would you not just come out and say you support such behavior in human beings on a purely rational basis, free from the restriction of taboos or Judeo Christian morality?
Why are you avoiding addressing the issue of your position on bestiality, incest, adults having sex with underage children with the consent of the child, and zoophilia?
If sex is just physical stimulation of pleasure centers, what is the problem in "going down that road" with these issues?
You aren't afraid to go there, are you? Why do you refuse to tell us what your position is?
yes, there is a clear victor.Quote from LongShot:
I officially plant the Flag of Atheism here on this thread right now!
We ATHEISTS have commandeered ANOTHER thread!
There isnt a christian to be found!
We have beat the christians senseless [they didnt have to go far] with their dumb incoherent doctrine ONCE AGAIN!
Atheists everywhere A ROUND OF APPLAUSE IS IN ORDER!
CLAP! CLAP! CLAP!
standing ovation for the atheists.....
You are then saying that you approve of bestiality, incest, zoophelia, and having sex with children under age but with their consent?
Is that right? As long as it is in the privacy of their bedroom (or barn as the case may be) you approve and support such sexual activity?
Is that right? As long as it is in the privacy of their bedroom (or barn as the case may be) you approve and support such sexual activity?