Quote from jack hershey:
This is true for several reasons.
My posts are dense. They are critical thinking oriented.
When a person "works" on understanding markets a lot of thinking goes on from the first spark to an automated pane involving high utility.
I spent about 4 months getting scoring down. As you have seen in the last several years there will NOT be a backtest of the scoring in the context of its universe and its signal generator (the unusual volume one pager). We know why, too. It would prove two things: one about a reader and one about an author.
Here, for sentiment, a different tool arrived. Measuring smart money's activity is a leading indicator of indexes that smart money is NOT trading as the dominant player group. How often does a thread appear that enquires about using leading sentiment indicators for trading? How often does a method made public for quite a while become used by very many people? Not often, since that is not possible as a consequence of how most people think. You prove that every single day.
What is it like for people who use smart money anticipatory indicators to read your posts? It is very humorous and worthwhile having the laugh.
Try to reflect. you post a cross eyed guy lookiung at his cork and I respond by calling about 20 trades in order for the next day as a response. Try to imagine the anticipatory sentiment indicator of smart money on the days of those advanced calls and the call within minutes of the end of a short channel.
The what if, is this: what if some ET members actually do learn to call the trades of the next day? what if they learn to use a smart money leading indicator? Well the answer is that they did and they do.
You wasted years and years of your life saying the same thing. Nothing. you have nothing to say but you say it anyway to keep the threads I post in at the top of the list. Thanks.
Put up another off topic pic for everyone amusement including mine.