Agreed, you were polite in this post. I had quoted incorrectly, I was referring to this:
debitspread said:
We shouldn't care wether the call is correct. Let the ego push the man, and expand itself. He'll learn eventually.
Last edited:
Marketsurfer says short shake shack
- Thread starter marketsurfer
- Start date
Agreed, you were polite in this post. I had quoted incorrectly, I was referring to this:
We shouldn't care wether the call is correct. Let the ego push the man, and expand itself. He'll learn eventually.
Not sure who we is. Certainly Surf's h8ers care very much about his entry prices, and have a hissy if they aren't thought to be specific enough.
Anyway, before you remark again on my tone, please do review Surf's threads and the tone of his interlocutors, including the f-bomb thrower.
One for the ages... .
SPY 211.09 +0.84 +0.40 %
SHAK 72.16 -1.65 -2.24 %
SPY 211.09 +0.84 +0.40 %
SHAK 72.16 -1.65 -2.24 %
Thanks for the kudos, Debit. Looks like we finally nailed this dawg. 50 is almost a certainty. We will ride it atleast that far.
surf
Yes, epic... where are all the h8ers now?
SPY 212.32 +1.73 +0.82 %
SHAK 69.13 -3.17 -4.38 %
Right here Mother. Unlike some I don't shut down my computer when position goes against me and hope for the best. If I did trade it, then I would have had a loss here.
It is starting to sound like you actually are a relative, spouse, or work colleague of this Surf guy. No one would seriously call this kind of trade "epic" unless they are selling a service.
So I assume some form of TA was used to devise a $50 level?
What about trade management as the trade progresses?
Strong argument can be made that trade management is more important than the initial entry criteria.