I wouldn't be surprised if they squeeze this yet again. It's not as if they don't know people were waiting for the first squeeze to end. They'll simply exit after the first squeeze and then do it again. In fact with such a high short float why EVER let this thing crash when its more lucrative to take money from people shorting it?
Every couple days you post, essentially, "SHAK might go up or down." I'm struggling to see the value-add.Above 83 : squeeze again, back to old high @ 97, and if broken, 115 / 120 ? Below 73 : well ..
That s right, for the last 2 weeks. As I wrote, we are in a trading range, and the support line (in green) is still valid for the last 2 weeks.
Read some of my older posts? Maybe you could find some "value-add". I haven't written thousands of post [sic], it should be fast, right?
Jacking surf? Not really. Again read my posts.Thanks for the invite. Would certainly facilitate understanding if you kept your own journal rather than jacking Surf's.
Thanks for the invite. Would certainly facilitate understanding if you kept your own journal rather than jacking Surf's.
Aren't Chris Mac's charts showing SHAK completely relevant to this thread? Plus, MS is an accommodating fellow who through his own admission encourages others' participations on his threads - as you well know!