Anek,
It wasn't my intention to criticize the method so my bad if it came off that way. I've studied the behavior of price for a good many years and I did a statistical study on patterns and what I found is the uncertainty about which way the price would move and the variety of ways you could approach the method made it a losing strategy. But, if you showed me a track record of generating consistent results doing it I wouldn't be all that surprised. Stock car drivers all drive the same car but somehow, someway, one guy manages to rise to the top. If you put 20 traders on the same pattern over and over someone would find a way. That person just wouldn't be me.
I just felt the probability of that method was low but someone can probably exploit it.
It wasn't my intention to criticize the method so my bad if it came off that way. I've studied the behavior of price for a good many years and I did a statistical study on patterns and what I found is the uncertainty about which way the price would move and the variety of ways you could approach the method made it a losing strategy. But, if you showed me a track record of generating consistent results doing it I wouldn't be all that surprised. Stock car drivers all drive the same car but somehow, someway, one guy manages to rise to the top. If you put 20 traders on the same pattern over and over someone would find a way. That person just wouldn't be me.
I just felt the probability of that method was low but someone can probably exploit it.
Quote from Anekdoten:
I know he does but it's obvious he could not get trend and patterns to work for him because of the way he criticizes the methodology.
Anek