So the concept is to allocate into various assets not based on nominal amount, but rather based on risk which you can do using some modicum of leverage. At lot of the happiness embedded in the strategy takes advantage of the low-to-negative correlation between bonds and risk assets. If I had to guess, there is probably about 500 billion invested in that strategy right now, with another few hundred doing it in a discretionary form.so help me here. you are a risk parity player beginning 2018. rates move to 3.20 ...you are still leveraged from beginning of the yr on the bond side , right ? what is your move now ? equities are off 4 % from the high. what if we go to 3.5 and you are still leveraged from jan 2018 ?? or have you adjusted/taken losses all along ? thanks for the insight.
Their exact actions depend, obviously, on the exact definition of the "risk parity" and the mandate of the fund. In a classical form, the risk is defined as volatility so if bonds became more volatile you'd had reallocated away from bonds, most likely into equity. So you can easily get a yo-yo type effect where they reallocate into equities, equities sell-off, they reallocate into bonds etc.
