Quote from bundlemaker:
Market profile is a wholistic theoretical basis to support trading decisions. It is impossible to make use of individual rules out of context of the whole picture. For instance increasing volatility means one thing in one market condition, quite another in a differenent market condition. Also, even in the same type of market condition, subtle differeneces in related factors will shift the priority of the various reference points that mp provides.
The best analogy I've seen is that of being a detective. Every case is different. The clues and evidence in one case (yesterdays market) are not the same as the next case (tomorrows market). It is as much art as science and intuition (which is not guessing) plays an important role. Market profile cannot be simply learned and then applied. A great deal of observational experience is an integral part of successful application of the theory.
Using individual mp concepts out of context will produce random results in the end.
Quote from ElectricSavant:
Hey...got a idea. Could he use the consensus of the MP's value area for each of those 100 stocks from the previous trading day to trade the opening futures price in the indicated direction?
Michael B.
Quote from bundlemaker:
Perhaps, but that's doing it the real hard way. A more direct path to the same understanding is to just trade the value area of the index. But, not in a vacuum. I have discovered that the reason so many people have said for so long that mp doesn't work is they think you can take reference points like a previous value area and trade off them with no consideration of the myriad other factors that go into overall market condition and expected action.
Quote from bundlemaker:
That's sort of a chicken and egg situation. Do stocks lead the index, or does the index (futures) lead the stocks? I've heard fabulously convincing arguments for both sides. I prefer a method that does not depend on figuring out who is right or when they become wrong. I avoid any sort of predictive analysis like the plague.
Quote from bundlemaker:
That's sort of a chicken and egg situation. Do stocks lead the index, or does the index (futures) lead the stocks? I've heard fabulously convincing arguments for both sides. I prefer a method that does not depend on figuring out who is right or when they become wrong. I avoid any sort of predictive analysis like the plague.