Quote from TGregg:
So what? If frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their @$$.
Are you trying to suggest that blasting off on top of 4 million pounds of LOX (or whatever that stuff is) in a giant tin can, hanging around in a vacumm for a week or two and then going mach 18 in a trip from space to the ground has the same risk as going from Pheonix to LA in an airplane?
Or are you trying to say we shouldn't go to space unless we can remove all risk?
No gregg.. none of the above.. just saying that its a risky business and not an outstanding record.. if you followed the challenger reports you will know it was carelessness in safety that led to the accident.. lowest bidder etc... my point is that they deserve the best and that 1 in 88 is crap as a safety ratio
I def believe in space travel and hope it continues and of course it is always going to be risky, just minimise the risk as much as possible.. not trying to pick an argument tho so please dont take this the wrong way sorry if I sounded like that..
Neil