Autumn is approaching, which some refer to as "fall". In the spirit of the season, last weekend, two economists went duck hunting. In their blind, they saw a mallard spook and take off with wings flapping. One economist, Melvin, shot to the left, and the other, Marvin, shot to the right. When they averaged their results, why..........".they" hit the duck and feasted on an imaginary meal.
Probability works fine for coin flipping. Nice, neat, generic, binary with just two outcomes (unless you consider the possiblity of landing on it's edge).
Here in the real world, price changes vary in magntitude, and hence alter future probabilites, or shall we say, odds. Factor in intervention, including the PPT, and the human element, such as specialists and market makers; then stir in some media influence and cheap money, and the decision tree becomes rather loose.
Besides, the definition of a recession is debatable. Just ask Melvin. Or Marvin. Ditto for bear markets, etc.
Just so this post is semi-constructive, attached is a decison tree of the S&P 500 in terms of direction (NOT magnitude).