MA's are non anchored indicators, offering largely vague TA information, just inaccurate.Market Observer:
themickey could be a little more kind!
However, I think his point may be that your conclusion, although it could be right, might be based on "evidence" that, in itself, isn't enough to draw that conclusion. Does that make sense?
An average price over the last 'x' days is nonsense because it depends on trend slope and volatility to accurately give a figure.
However in this day and age technicians continue to be wedded to the largely uselessness of MA's and continue the myth of how these indicators lead to accurate prognosis & decisions.
A slightly better way would be to make the statement, "More than 50% of stocks in the index are above the MA" (choose your own subjective MA period).
