Congrats on your wins. I am trailer trash. I trade NQ. When I am not insulting my betters.
Quote from Arthur Deco:
"I learned very quickly the only math that was relevant to consistently profitable outcomes in trading was logic."
Exhausted the limits of your arithmetic skills, I guess.
Quote from Arthur Deco:
Congrats on your wins. I am trailer trash. I trade NQ. When I am not insulting my betters.
Quote from Arthur Deco:
I think that's called non-stationary statistics. I cut the Gordian Knot with backtesting that merges it all together. Neither are the results stationary, but they suffice to make pocket change and to keep an old man out of trouble.
Quote from Arthur Deco:
That is also the realm of estimation theory, where you have some rough idea of the dynamics and the noise, and an answer which is "close enough" is good enough. Who cares if you make $100 vs. $110 per contract on a scalp?
Quote from gifropan:
Can anyone explain what is meant by market noise and for intraday trading does the market noise depend on the time of day, economic figures or other factors.
Quote from ProfLogic:
In logic and in programming, close enough isn't good enough but I agree with your point.
For me it isn't the difference between $100 or $110 per contract, it is the difference between taking a trade or not which is potentially far more expensive.
Quote from Arthur Deco:
We may be closer in attitide than I thought at first. Take the trade, or not? At what downside risk with what entry stop? At what potential loss of upside profit in a reversal while wanting to let it ride to what profit stop? At what loss of further upside profit by taking the statistically correct profit? Within the limits of the typical daily range, you get to pick all those things, given the blessing of an edge.