You may want to check out www.volatilitytradingstrategies.com
No thank you. I don't get my kicks out of a professional golfer posting pics of cats, a hot woman, and a fancy sports car. It just reeks of "look at me".
You may want to check out www.volatilitytradingstrategies.com
Perhaps you should be looking at non-correlation instead of correlation, like us options traders?I've been keeping an eye on the correlation between VX future, bonds and the equity indices, and so far no joy.

Are you a subscriber? If so, how was it? Profitable?You may want to check out www.volatilitytradingstrategies.com
No. I've corresponded with Brent about his composite volatility indicator and watched some of his YouTube videos. I like his approach re risk management but never pulled the trigger with a subscription.Are you a subscriber? If so, how was it? Profitable?
Why didn't you? He claimed this level of returns with a red light green light trading system, real easy to follow:No. I've corresponded with Brent about his composite volatility indicator and watched some of his YouTube videos. I like his approach re risk management but never pulled the trigger with a subscription.
I've been trading my own strategies (backtested to 1995) with good results. I don't think a backtest to 2010 is long enough (it doesn't include extreme market periods like 2000 and 2008).Why didn't you? He claimed this level of returns with a red light green light trading system, real easy to follow:
View attachment 213579
> 50% CAGR since 2010 for only $80/month subscription fee!!! Invest $5,000 using this system starting in 2010, by now you would have $186,875 in your trading account.
Sounds too good to be true???
Interesting
Why Dow 28,000 could mark that ‘blowoff top’ bears have been predicting
By Shawn Langlois
Published: Nov 17, 2019 9:25 p.m. ET
Last month, the Federal Reserve began snatching up short-term Treasury debt to the tune of $60 billion per month in response to the repo mess that sent a chill through Wall Street back in September.
While it might sound like another round of quantitative easing, Fed Chair Jerome Powell wanted to make it clear: It’s not. “In no sense is this QE,” he said.
Smith used this chart to help make his point:
![]()
“Calling QE not-QE doesn’t make it different than QE,” Smith wrote. “The Fed’s level of panic is noteworthy, as is the absurd transparency of its laughable attempt to conceal its panic.”
And with that panic, Smith believes that the recent pop to new highs in the stock market could finally mark that elusive blowoff top.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/w...off-top-bears-have-been-predicting-2019-11-17