Market calls...100% accurate!
- Thread starter ML_QUANT
- Start date
With all due respect, you sound a bit like Alex of PureTick. The difference is he is selling something and you're not (yet).Quote from ML_QUANT:
I won't get involved in this thread vandalism by your lot et al. but you know I have posted hundreds of live trades with full details as reported by Ninja and they could be cross checked against Times & Sales by those who actually have a live feed(excluding yourself) and I have also posted a $10,000 reward for any one who could prove just ONE of them to be false! So here boy, this is your only chance to make some Doll. go for it.
Ah, sorry, just a little catch though, you need to put up $1000 in escrow to win my 10 grand in the same escrow, so I guess, again you are excluded. I understand, with the economy as it is, you'll barely mange to survive let alone have an additional k handy.
Asi que, buzz off little boy,run along.....
Here we go again, one more thread Vandalized by the hooligans while the mods snore at the wheel....
10 to 1, ny1? Watz up hooligans, can't pull 1k between the whole lot of ya
Can't you just stay professional and ignore childish tit-for-tat comments? Simply don't reply to those who egg you on and you'll get more traction.
Honestly, I find it hard to take you seriously with the braggadocio remarks too.
I don't get it. By your own admission in the first post, you're papertrading and now you imply you trade live because of that attachment?Quote from ML_QUANT:
One example from many of simultaneous long & short with different weights.
Attention ALL my loyal barking Dogs:
Is this what you call paper trading?!
just one of many....
OK, you may continue to Bark your hearts out now....
Quote from ML_QUANT:
There's a $10,000 reward for anyone who can prove a single trade of mine from the many hundreds I have posted to be paper/simulator trade. The same also applies to anyone showing any quote of mine from any thread where I have said what you claim.
So, there's an easy $10k go for it
Where I come from, Sim (as you refer to it) is papertrading.
PM and I'll send you details for wiring the money. Easiest $10K I ever made. The issue will be collecting as it always is with these types.
Well, that didn't take long
RTFQ, I said as a Disclaimer "..use.." (as in others to use a sim...) "tonto", I didn't say I use...duh....that was meant for others so I would not become responsible for trading outcomes by OTHERS based on my calls>Quote from rolextrader:
Where I come from, Sim (as you refer to it) is papertrading.
PM and I'll send you details for wiring the money. Easiest $10K I ever made. The issue will be collecting as it always is with these types.
Do you know what Disclaimer means?
OK, the reward was a 10 to 1 bet, you owe me $1k but being Inauguration and all, you're Pardoned.
Now that the noise, interruptions and vandalism has somehow been subdued, maybe we can meanwhile get some useful contents squeezed in here now!
It is amazing how some people are threatened by others success in areas where they themselves have failed. Rather than being content that there is a way and their belief was right but not their approach, instead they choose to disrespect others' desires to learn who don't suffer from the same inferior complexity as they do.
It is amazing how some people are threatened by others success in areas where they themselves have failed. Rather than being content that there is a way and their belief was right but not their approach, instead they choose to disrespect others' desires to learn who don't suffer from the same inferior complexity as they do.
A new approach in trading, calls for being long & short simultaneously.
I came across this concept when during the >2 decades of trading was always confronted by the DD dilemma.
DD is a natural and necessary part of Trading since the price moves in Zig Zags but, my new method is about not being married to the main position while one continues to respect it. I have always(wrongfully so) traded without a stop, based on the concept that there should be a reason to enter a trade in the first place and until that reason has not abolished there is no need to vacate a trade with predetermined losses(unless the stop is say support line penetration based in which case it is OK to take a loss since it is confirming the absence of the original reason the trade was entered into but it should not be personal risk tolerance level based).
An example is say you enter a short trade based on a 30 period SMA at a price of 100. While still in the trade the 15 period SMA is quite naturally producing a Buy signal. There is no need to ignore this latest signal now and based on the new approach why not make some money from the same DD itself?!
It is illegal to be long and short the same instrument in the same or different accounts by the same entity. The way around this however is very simple which is best done by auto trading systems but you can also do it manually.
Here is how, you were short 1 contract at 100 and now you need to go long for a short period of time, so do it. Just buy 1 contract which in reality is making you go flat and when the target of the shorter term trade is reached you exit that imaginary trade and will be short 1 contract again.
Asi que, DD's are good and can generate additional gains. This approach has nothing to do with pair trading and there is a lot more to it than mentioned here.
So, next time rather than sacrificing a valid entry for hitting a stop loss, consider the above which requires a huge amount of discipline.
Your trading system dictates the entries and exits but generally speaking not a good idea to take a loss on the opposing trade.
I came across this concept when during the >2 decades of trading was always confronted by the DD dilemma.
DD is a natural and necessary part of Trading since the price moves in Zig Zags but, my new method is about not being married to the main position while one continues to respect it. I have always(wrongfully so) traded without a stop, based on the concept that there should be a reason to enter a trade in the first place and until that reason has not abolished there is no need to vacate a trade with predetermined losses(unless the stop is say support line penetration based in which case it is OK to take a loss since it is confirming the absence of the original reason the trade was entered into but it should not be personal risk tolerance level based).
An example is say you enter a short trade based on a 30 period SMA at a price of 100. While still in the trade the 15 period SMA is quite naturally producing a Buy signal. There is no need to ignore this latest signal now and based on the new approach why not make some money from the same DD itself?!
It is illegal to be long and short the same instrument in the same or different accounts by the same entity. The way around this however is very simple which is best done by auto trading systems but you can also do it manually.
Here is how, you were short 1 contract at 100 and now you need to go long for a short period of time, so do it. Just buy 1 contract which in reality is making you go flat and when the target of the shorter term trade is reached you exit that imaginary trade and will be short 1 contract again.
Asi que, DD's are good and can generate additional gains. This approach has nothing to do with pair trading and there is a lot more to it than mentioned here.
So, next time rather than sacrificing a valid entry for hitting a stop loss, consider the above which requires a huge amount of discipline.
Your trading system dictates the entries and exits but generally speaking not a good idea to take a loss on the opposing trade.