Market activity after Nixon resignation and Clinton impeachment?

Thanks.

I think you're talking about something sometimes referred to as the "Nixon Shock". I see some notes about it (3 sentences) in my old man's diary. I'll do some research about it this weekend because there's no further reference nor explanations about it.
Wiki has a good article. Prior to Nixon taking us off the gold standard we were operating under a currency exchange rate convention established at the Bretton Woods conference in the closing days of WWII. The price of gold was to be at fixed at $35/Oz. The U.S. agreed to redeem dollars at that price and the international exchange rates were related to the fixed price of gold. In 1971, while the U.S. was redeeming international dollars @ $35/Oz., gold was selling elsewhere for $40/Oz. There was no way for the U.S. to maintain the price at $35. This is why a gold standard is impractical today.

John Maynard Keynes foresaw this problem and other problems associated with a single country's currency being adopted as the Reserve Currency. Keynes argued against the gold standard at Bretton Woods but was opposed by Dexter White and the U.S. delegation whose arguments held sway. This is how after WWII the U.S. dollar became the Reserve Currency in which virtually all international trade was carried out. That status, which has been an advantage to the U.S., but also comes with some drawbacks, is now threatened. For practical reasons the U.S. dollar will likely continue for a long time as one of the reserve currencies for trade, but increasingly, pricing and trade is being carried out in Euros as well.

I want to mention one of the reasons the adoption of the U.S. dollar as the Reserve Currency for International Trade is an advantage to the U.S. This is something often not fully appreciated. Because the dollar is the reserve currency, the world is awash in U.S. dollars. Some other countries have even adopted the Dollar as their local currency, e.g. Ecuador. What this means in a practical sense is that Central Banks around the world maintain large dollar denominated inventories to facilitate trade. Consequently Central banks have a vested interest in helping to maintain the dollar's stability. It would not be in their interest to see a sudden collapse of the dollar. This affords the U.S. some extra leeway in maintaining the stability of its own economy via Central Bank operations.
 
You are asking the original question because you would like to know what to do when Trump gets out of office early. I, unlike James Comey can understand "intent".

I think Spicer calls it context, you're interpreting the context erroneously.
 
Even if there was a pattern there, its not something id want to bet on with Trump, the market could just as easily gap up 50 points as gap down if Trump was to drop dead or be impeached.

Forget about impeachment. That is just a bunch of BS.
 
He might LET them impeach him, but only so he can smack them around and make them look stupid when they loose the proceedings.


You do know his WWE smack downs weren't real, right? I think the accountants that are the bread and butter if the FBI will see that Trump, also, laundered money with his wannabe mobster friends.
 
Do you have some reason to expect Trump to go bye bye?

Beside that he hates to be president or working? He should just fake a heart attack and call it a day. Everybody wins!!!

The business enviroment doesn't need to change under Pence.
 
In contrast, during Clinton years...Gold was on a steady decline but not with the same volatility it had going upwards soon after Nixon years.
Gold was following, or anticipating, the dollar after the Nixon shock and during Clinton. Then add market irrationality on top. I haven't done this, but after the Nixon shock I think keeping track of bank reserves and the amount of FOMC intervention and its direction (On average are they selling or buying treasuries to hit their target ) could be one of the gold traders best tells. I don't do gold. (We can also fairly reliably anticipate what is going to happen to reserves, savings and investment based on the anticipated size of deficits. But can we reliably predict deficits? Probably reliably enough. The big problem is that too few people have read an economics textbook, so they don't know how they are supposed to to react.)
 
Last edited:
He might LET them impeach him, but only so he can smack them around and make them look stupid when they loose the proceedings.
Do you think he might LET that nice Mr. Mueller look at his tax returns? :D
 
FALSE

Not an argument. :)

He wants admiration and he is a lazy fuck who can't/don't want to read. Being the president requires lots of reading, and he isn't admired much according to the polls. According to his own words, he HATES everyone at the White House. Not to mention that investigation thingy. Now what is your argument? Oh, you don't have one...
 
Back
Top