Quote from tomahawk:
Are you suggesting smoking increases quality of life, overall??
Even if a long-time smoker managages to dodge all of the smoking-related diseases (which would be extremely rare), why take the risk? There are plenty of less unhealthy things to allow yourself to get addicted to.
My mother smoked throughout the first half of her adult life. After having quit for about 20 years she only had some mild COPD, which manifested as mild congestion and a cough every so often. Then one day a routine CT scan accidentally picked up a tiny nodule on her lung (the scan was for an area unrelated to the lungs). It was removed surgically, along with a large portion of her lung, just to be safe. Well she only lived for about 15 months after that.
And if you're not familiar with the "quality of life" of a lung cancer patient, let me tell you the biggest issues have nothing to do with breathing or lungs.
Again, I guess reading and getting what is written are 2 different things. No, I don't say smoking is good, as a matter of fact I mention in a post my Dad has COPD and suffers from having smoked, not just cigarettes, but pipes and cigars, which he will still deny has any impact on his current condition, and I call bullshit all the time.
I do say that I guess people need to live their lives as they chose within reason. Some live with minimal ill effects and live well beyond the averages. Others live a "healthy" life and die well before. Like Jim Fix and Greta Weis, marathon runners who lived healthy lives as a couple of examples.
I'm not looking to argue, so give it a rest. Smoking bad, dah! Drinking in excess bad, dah! All kinds of things are bad, but at some point as humans we make choices, and some choices for some people will impact them sooner than others. I smoke a cigar now and agin, and it may affect my long term health, but I have made the choice and am not going to whine after the fact.