Mar-a-Lago Raided by FBI

You have to love how the conspiracy theorists claim that the redacted stuff only damages the overall case against Donald.

If that were really true, don't they realize it'd be simpler to have just omitted it to begin with?
 
exGOPer said:
You have to love how the conspiracy theorists claim that the redacted stuff only damages the overall case against Donald.

If that were really true, don't they realize it'd be simpler to have just omitted it to begin with?
More...


Commen sense is not so commen for a certain group.
 
MAGA-told-to-think.jpg
 
Let's catch up with the MAGA / Trump talking points:

1. There were no boxes at Mar-a-Lago
2. Other people brought those boxes to Mar-a-Lago
3. Archives could have retrieved the boxes anytime they wanted
4. All the documents in the boxes were declassified
5. I was protecting the boxes for the Archives
6. The boxes were planted by the FBI
7. Obama had more boxes
8.The documents should not have been classified in the first place
9. The documents were already returned.
10. They were my documents
11. There was a standing order that any documents I took out of the Oval Office were automatically declassified
12. Mishandled and rushed move by GSA
13. Invented hoax because J6 Committee ratings were dropping
14. Laws against espionage are wrong
15. Documents are protected by Client-attorney Privilege
16. Documents are protected by Executive Privilege
17. Not only were the FBI wrong in taking them - they better give them back
18. The sensitivity of the documents has expired.
19. Like President Nixon said, "if the president does it, then it is not illegal."
20. I don't believe in the classification system
21. It was an assassination plot
22. Charging Trump would cause so much mayhem it would be a monstrous mistake
23. Every President takes classified documents with them when they leave
24. Mark Meadows planted the documents.
25. I couldn't trust National Archives with the documents because they're controlled by Biden and Obama
26. Only a limited number of Mar-a-Lago staff had access to the documents
27. The documents were for a personal memoir.
28. If it was so serious, why did the FBI take so long to search Mar-a-Lago
29. Not serious because affidavit for warrant didn't include nuclear secrets.


Dazzle-them-T.jpg
 
Good1 said:
I haven't read all you've said yet, just addressing the basic issue of the realness factor of the charts.

Let it be known that the Reuters explanation does not question the realness of the charts. It merely gives explanation why one of the charts was right, if you don't discount the fat finger clerical error, and therefore, must be wrong if you DO discount the fat finger.

What I have said is ok, but once you discount the fat finger, then it's obvious Trump should have won that state.

Then, as far as the other chart, again, the realness of the chart is not questioned. The explanation given is those were absentee ballots all coming in at the same time, not all for Trump. What they avoid saying out loud is the absentee ballots, that came in all at the same time, must have been 95% for Biden to produce the results we see on the chart.

That's something that should have been addressed by the DOJ because, contrary to what Barr said, that brings the issue to a level where it can throw the entire election.
More...

Truthiness-definition.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top